// Run when the user invokes /rpa-bugfix together with a clear bug description (expected vs actual, reproduction). Reproduction test first, then fix, full test suite, short report. Will not work correctly without the bug details.
| name | rpa-bugfix |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Run when the user invokes /rpa-bugfix together with a clear bug description (expected vs actual, reproduction). Reproduction test first, then fix, full test suite, short report. Will not work correctly without the bug details. |
The user must include /rpa-bugfix and a bug description (expected vs actual, steps to reproduce, environment if relevant). Paste issue text when possible. If reproduction is impossible without one missing fact, ask that single blocking question.
Encode the intended behavior in a regression test so the defect cannot silently return.
.venv and project test commands.Brief: root cause, fix, test added or changed, full suite outcome, files touched.
Run when the user invokes /rpa-feat together with a clear feature description (for example issue text). BDD workflow: plan, failing tests, implementation, green tests, full suite, docs and examples, linter at the end. Will not work correctly without the user supplying what to build.
Run when the user invokes /rpa-gen-rules or asks to create or refresh agent project rules (Cursor .mdc, Claude Code CLAUDE.md and .claude/rules). Infers from specs, docs, and code. Rules use a layered-cake model (implement inner layers with no dependencies first, then the next layer) and BDD-style delivery. No separate user brief required.
Run when the user invokes /rpa-init or asks to onboard or warm up context on a repository. The agent studies code, reads documentation and test code, sets up the dev environment as the project expects, runs tests, and writes a short project report. No extra user brief is required.
Use when the user needs logical analysis, reasoning chains, or critical thinking grounded in classical formal logic (concepts, judgments, syllogisms, induction, fallacies). Triggers: analyzing arguments, checking validity of inferences, classifying concepts or judgments, building syllogisms, identifying logical errors, solving logic textbook problems, constructing proofs, or evaluating hypotheses and analogies.