メニュー
Run technical UI quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsiveness, and anti-patterns, then return a scored action plan.
| name | audit |
| description | Run technical UI quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsiveness, and anti-patterns, then return a scored action plan. |
| argument-hint | [area] |
| user-invocable | true |
Run a technical quality review of the target UI without silently drifting into implementation work.
impeccable first.impeccable teach before continuing.Score each dimension from 0 to 4:
Start the report by answering one question plainly:
Does this look generic or AI-generated?
Call out specific tells such as gradient text, accent side stripes, purple-blue default palettes, nested cards, or weak typographic hierarchy.
P0 through P3)For each issue include:
polish, typeset, colorize, adapt, or a domain-pack implementation pass).Adapt interfaces for different devices, breakpoints, platforms, and usage contexts without sacrificing core usability.
Add purposeful motion, transitions, and micro-interactions that clarify state change, feedback, and delight without sacrificing performance or accessibility.
Deprecated upstream wrapper kept for completeness. Not a primary route. The local bundle does not vendor upstream `layout`; use `shape` for layout planning or `impeccable` for integrated UI refinement instead.
Push safe or generic UI toward stronger contrast, personality, and memorability while keeping the experience usable and coherent.
Improve labels, microcopy, error states, and instructions so users understand what is happening and what to do next.
Introduce purposeful color and contrast where the interface feels monochrome, timid, or emotionally flat.