ワンクリックで
collab
// Gemini and Codex collaboratively brainstorm solutions, building on each other's ideas across rounds. Agent synthesizes the best ideas into a plan.
// Gemini and Codex collaboratively brainstorm solutions, building on each other's ideas across rounds. Agent synthesizes the best ideas into a plan.
Autonomously create a plan, consult Gemini and Codex for improvements, apply feedback, and implement. No user interaction - uses best judgment throughout.
Turn an idea into a concrete design through structured dialogue.
Claude brainstorms with an opponent LLM (Gemini or Codex) in alternating turns, building on each other's ideas. Synthesizes the best ideas into a plan.
Commit the staged changes. If there are no staged changes, stage all changes first.
Consult Gemini and Codex for high-level planning, synthesize into a detailed plan, implement, then get final review. No user interaction.
Consult an external LLM with the user's query.
| name | collab |
| description | Gemini and Codex collaboratively brainstorm solutions, building on each other's ideas across rounds. Agent synthesizes the best ideas into a plan. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Have Gemini and Codex collaboratively brainstorm solutions, then synthesize the best ideas into a plan. Both LLMs build on each other's ideas across rounds rather than critiquing positions.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Explore the codebase - use Glob, Grep, Read to understand:
Make reasonable assumptions - do NOT ask clarifying questions
Prepare context summary - create a brief summary of:
Have both LLMs independently brainstorm approaches (in parallel).
Seed prompt:
I need to implement the following task:
[Task description]
Here's what I found in the codebase:
[Context summary - relevant files, patterns, conventions]
Brainstorm implementation ideas:
1. **Ideas**: List 2-3 possible approaches with brief descriptions
2. **Favorite**: Which approach do you lean toward and why?
3. **Open questions**: What aspects are you unsure about or would benefit from another perspective?
4. **Risks**: What could go wrong or be tricky?
Think creatively. Share rough ideas — we're exploring, not committing.
Spawn BOTH as parallel subagents (Agent tool, subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet"). NEVER run subagents in the background — always run them in the foreground so you can process their results immediately. Each subagent prompt must include the full seed prompt text and file list so it can make the MCP call independently.
Gemini subagent — prompt must include:
mcp__consult-llm__consult_llm with model: "gemini", prompt: the seed prompt, files: [array of relevant source files][thread_id:xxx] prefixCodex subagent — prompt must include:
mcp__consult-llm__consult_llm with model: "openai", prompt: the seed prompt, files: [array of relevant source files][thread_id:xxx] prefixExtract thread IDs: Save gemini_thread_id and codex_thread_id from the [thread_id:xxx] prefixes in the subagent responses.
Present both sets of ideas to the user.
Each round, share both LLMs' ideas with each other and ask them to build on them (in parallel). Use thread_id to continue each LLM's conversation. Continue until the ideas converge into a clear approach — typically 2-3 rounds, but use as many as needed.
Build-on prompt (same for both, include the other's ideas):
A collaborator shared these ideas:
[Other LLM's response from the previous round]
Build on their thinking:
1. **What resonates**: Which ideas are strong? Why?
2. **Combinations**: Can any ideas be combined into something better?
3. **New ideas**: Did their thinking spark any new approaches?
4. **Refinements**: How would you improve the most promising ideas so far?
5. **Concerns resolved**: Did their ideas address any open questions?
Keep building — don't tear down. Refine toward the best solution.
Spawn BOTH as parallel subagents (Agent tool, subagent_type: "general-purpose", model: "sonnet"). NEVER run subagents in the background — always run them in the foreground so you can process their results immediately. Each subagent prompt must include the full build-on prompt text and thread_id so it can make the MCP call independently.
Gemini subagent — prompt must include:
mcp__consult-llm__consult_llm with model: "gemini", prompt: build-on prompt with Codex's ideas, thread_id: gemini_thread_id[thread_id:xxx] prefixCodex subagent — prompt must include:
mcp__consult-llm__consult_llm with model: "openai", prompt: build-on prompt with Gemini's ideas, thread_id: codex_thread_id[thread_id:xxx] prefixPresent both responses to the user after each round.
When to stop: Both LLMs are refining details rather than introducing new ideas, and a clear approach has emerged. Don't stop while there are still unresolved open questions or competing directions.
After all rounds, synthesize the brainstorm into a plan:
Identify the strongest ideas — which approaches gained momentum across rounds?
Note convergence — where did both LLMs naturally align?
Pick the best combination — merge the strongest elements into one coherent approach
Write the plan:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
## Brainstorm Summary
**Key ideas from Gemini:** [2-3 bullet points]
**Key ideas from Codex:** [2-3 bullet points]
**Convergence:** [Where they naturally agreed]
**Synthesis:** [How the final approach combines the best of both]
---
### Task 1: [Short description]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py` (lines 123-145)
**Steps:**
1. [Specific action]
2. [Specific action]
**Code:**
```language
// Include actual code, not placeholders
```
---
Guidelines:
Save the plan to history/plan-<feature-name>.md.