ワンクリックでManusで任意のスキルを実行

$pwd:

seo-competitor-pages

Name: Seo Competitor Pages
Author: sickn33

// Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", or "X vs Y".

Manusで実行

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:34,867

forks:5,753

updated:2026年4月13日 22:14

SKILL.md

readonly

package.json

"author": "sickn33"

"repository": "sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills"

$ gh browse

$ install --globalskills.sh

$ download --local

Manusで実行

[HINT] SKILL.mdと関連ファイルを含む完全なスキルディレクトリをダウンロード

related-imports.ts

// 関連スキル

import article-writing

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import content-engine

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import article-writing

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import article-writing

import article-writing

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import content-engine

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import content-engine

from "affaan-m"

165,920

import internal-comms

import content-creator

from "Shubhamsaboo"

107,270

name	seo-competitor-pages
description	Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", or "X vs Y".
risk	unknown
source	https://github.com/AgriciDaniel/claude-seo
date_added	2026-03-21
user-invokable	true
argument-hint	[url or generate] [competitor]
allowed-tools	["Read","Grep","Glob","Bash","WebFetch"]

Competitor Comparison & Alternatives Pages

Create high-converting comparison and alternatives pages that target competitive intent keywords with accurate, structured content.

When to Use

Use when creating X vs Y comparison pages or alternatives pages.
Use when targeting competitor-intent keywords with SEO landing pages.
Use when the user needs structured comparison content, feature matrices, or conversion-oriented competitor pages.

Page Types

1. "X vs Y" Comparison Pages

Direct head-to-head comparison between two products/services
Balanced feature-by-feature analysis
Clear verdict or recommendation with justification
Target keyword: [Product A] vs [Product B]

2. "Alternatives to X" Pages

List of alternatives to a specific product/service
Each alternative with brief summary, pros/cons, best-for use case
Target keyword: [Product] alternatives, best alternatives to [Product]

3. "Best [Category] Tools" Roundup Pages

Curated list of top tools/services in a category
Ranking criteria clearly stated
Target keyword: best [category] tools [year], top [category] software

4. Comparison Table Pages

Feature matrix with multiple products in columns
Sortable/filterable if interactive
Target keyword: [category] comparison, [category] comparison chart

Comparison Table Generation

Feature Matrix Layout

| Feature          | Your Product | Competitor A | Competitor B |
|------------------|:------------:|:------------:|:------------:|
| Feature 1        | ✅           | ✅           | ❌           |
| Feature 2        | ✅           | ⚠️ Partial   | ✅           |
| Feature 3        | ✅           | ❌           | ❌           |
| Pricing (from)   | $X/mo        | $Y/mo        | $Z/mo        |
| Free Tier        | ✅           | ❌           | ✅           |

Data Accuracy Requirements

All feature claims must be verifiable from public sources
Pricing must be current (include "as of [date]" note)
Update frequency: review quarterly or when competitors ship major changes
Link to source for each competitor data point where possible

Schema Markup Recommendations

Product Schema with AggregateRating

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Product",
  "name": "[Product Name]",
  "description": "[Product Description]",
  "brand": {
    "@type": "Brand",
    "name": "[Brand Name]"
  },
  "aggregateRating": {
    "@type": "AggregateRating",
    "ratingValue": "[Rating]",
    "reviewCount": "[Count]",
    "bestRating": "5",
    "worstRating": "1"
  }
}

SoftwareApplication (for software comparisons)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
  "name": "[Software Name]",
  "applicationCategory": "[Category]",
  "operatingSystem": "[OS]",
  "offers": {
    "@type": "Offer",
    "price": "[Price]",
    "priceCurrency": "USD"
  }
}

ItemList (for roundup pages)

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ItemList",
  "name": "Best [Category] Tools [Year]",
  "itemListOrder": "https://schema.org/ItemListOrderDescending",
  "numberOfItems": "[Count]",
  "itemListElement": [
    {
      "@type": "ListItem",
      "position": 1,
      "name": "[Product Name]",
      "url": "[Product URL]"
    }
  ]
}

Keyword Targeting

Comparison Intent Patterns

Pattern	Example	Search Volume Signal
`[A] vs [B]`	"Slack vs Teams"	High
`[A] alternative`	"Figma alternatives"	High
`[A] alternatives [year]`	"Notion alternatives 2026"	High
`best [category] tools`	"best project management tools"	High
`[A] vs [B] for [use case]`	"AWS vs Azure for startups"	Medium
`[A] review [year]`	"Monday.com review 2026"	Medium
`[A] vs [B] pricing`	"HubSpot vs Salesforce pricing"	Medium
`is [A] better than [B]`	"is Notion better than Confluence"	Medium

Title Tag Formulas

X vs Y: [A] vs [B]: [Key Differentiator] ([Year])
Alternatives: [N] Best [A] Alternatives in [Year] (Free & Paid)
Roundup: [N] Best [Category] Tools in [Year], Compared & Ranked

H1 Patterns

Match title tag intent
Include primary keyword naturally
Keep under 70 characters

Conversion-Optimized Layouts

CTA Placement

Above fold: Brief comparison summary with primary CTA
After comparison table: "Try [Your Product] free" CTA
Bottom of page: Final recommendation with CTA
Avoid aggressive CTAs in competitor description sections (reduces trust)

Social Proof Sections

Customer testimonials relevant to comparison criteria
G2/Capterra/TrustPilot ratings (with source links)
Case studies showing migration from competitor
"Switched from [Competitor]" stories

Pricing Highlights

Clear pricing comparison table
Highlight value advantages (not just lowest price)
Include hidden costs (setup fees, per-user pricing, overage charges)
Link to full pricing page

Trust Signals

"Last updated [date]" timestamp
Author with relevant expertise
Methodology disclosure (how comparisons were conducted)
Disclosure of own product affiliation

Fairness Guidelines

Accuracy: All competitor information must be verifiable from public sources
No defamation: Never make false or misleading claims about competitors
Cite sources: Link to competitor websites, review sites, or documentation
Timely updates: Review and update when competitors release major changes
Disclose affiliation: Clearly state which product is yours
Balanced presentation: Acknowledge competitor strengths honestly
Pricing accuracy: Include "as of [date]" disclaimers on all pricing data
Feature verification: Test competitor features where possible, cite documentation otherwise

Internal Linking

Link to your own product/service pages from comparison sections
Cross-link between related comparison pages (e.g., "A vs B" links to "A vs C")
Link to feature-specific pages when discussing individual features
Breadcrumb: Home > Comparisons > [This Page]
Related comparisons section at bottom of page
Link to case studies and testimonials mentioned in the comparison

Output

Comparison Page Template

COMPARISON-PAGE.md: Ready-to-implement page structure with sections
Feature matrix table
Content outline with word count targets (minimum 1,500 words)

Schema Markup

comparison-schema.json: Product/SoftwareApplication/ItemList JSON-LD

Keyword Strategy

Primary and secondary keywords
Related long-tail opportunities
Content gaps vs existing competitor pages

Recommendations

Content improvements for existing comparison pages
New comparison page opportunities
Schema markup additions
Conversion optimization suggestions

Error Handling

Scenario	Action
Competitor URL unreachable	Report which competitor URLs failed. Proceed with available data and note gaps in the comparison.
Insufficient competitor data (pricing, features unavailable)	Flag missing data points clearly. Use "Not publicly available" in comparison tables rather than guessing.
No product/service overlap found	Report that the products serve different markets. Suggest alternative competitors that share feature overlap, or pivot to a category roundup format.

Limitations

Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.