hiring-evaluation

name	Hiring Evaluation
description	Evaluate whether to hire a new agent and define the role
version	1.0
tags	["hr","hiring"]
requires_tools	[]

Process

1. Assess need: Why is a new hire needed? What gap does it fill?
2. Check capacity: Review current team workload and performance scores
3. Budget check: Verify token budget can support another agent
4. Define the role: Specify responsibilities, required skills, and reporting line
5. Make recommendation: Hire or don't hire, with justification

Evaluation Framework

Need Assessment

• What tasks are currently not being done or done poorly?
• Could an existing agent be retrained/reassigned instead?
• Is this a temporary need or ongoing?

Role Definition

• Title: Clear, descriptive role name
• Department: Where in the org chart
• Reports to: Which manager
• Archetype: Manager (can delegate) or Worker (executes)
• Key responsibilities: 3-5 bullet points
• Required tools: What MCP access they need
• Persona: Personality traits that would be effective

Budget Impact

• Token limit needed (default: 50,000)
• Expected daily usage
• Total company token budget impact

Output Format

Hiring Recommendation: [HIRE / DO NOT HIRE]

Proposed Role: [Title] Department: [Name] Reports to: [Manager name] Justification: [2-3 sentences]

Role Details:

• Responsibilities: ...
• Required tools: ...
• Suggested persona: ...

Budget Impact: [X tokens/session, Y% of company budget]

Guidelines

• Always check performance scores of current team first
• Prefer reassignment over new hire when possible (cost-effective)
• New managers should only be hired if span of control is too wide (>5 direct reports)
• Consider department balance — don't over-invest in one area