aoa-skills
aoa-skills에는 8Dionysus에서 수집한 skills 9개가 있으며, 저장소 수준 직업 범위와 사이트 내 skill 상세 페이지를 제공합니다.
이 저장소의 skills
Find, record, correct, or supersede a durable repository decision and its derived indexes. Use for prior rationale, a meaningful accepted choice, or decision-source/index drift. Do not use for ordinary documentation, an open choice, current source-authority conflicts, or runtime/generated authority mapping.
Select or apply an owner-local or cross-repository eval, route a confirmed no-fit to intake/design, or classify supplied session hits as eval candidates. Use aoa-evals for central proof bundles, named results or verdicts, reports, and lifecycle. Do not use for ordinary tests, undefined invariants, or generic session harvesting.
Carry provisional checkpoint hints into a reviewed session closeout: harvest, progression, quest-promotion, and branch handoff. Use to collect bounded hints or execute after the current session artifact is closed and reviewed. Do not use mid-session for final judgment, without reviewed evidence, as a hidden playbook runner, or to write owner truth.
Use only before any memo artifact exists to decide whether live-session, closeout, landed-work, PR, diff, or review evidence yields one guarded memo candidate, export, or no-write result. If a concrete memo candidate, export, object, corpus, lifecycle, or read-model target already exists, use aoa-memo. Do not use for eval mining, raw-session maintenance, generic harvest, recall, durable memory, or proof.
Use only when a literal ref to a closed/reviewed session packet is supplied, to extract, classify, propose promotion or branching, or identify an automation opportunity. Missing, live, or unreviewed evidence must fail closed without inventing a ref. Natural closeout preservation belongs to aoa-memo-writeback. Do not use for generic summaries, progression, direct owner writes, scheduling, mutation, or telemetry authority.
Diagnose a reviewed recurring session/workflow failure, or carry one bounded owner repair through checkpoint, rollback, and real health verification. Use for reviewed contamination, drift, repeated route/tool failure, or an established diagnosis ready for repair. Do not use on live evidence, for vague self-improvement, or to call a proposed or merely executed change verified.
Sanitize private technical material into a public-safe owner-bounded derivative, or resolve authority among authored, generated, runtime, and installed sources. Use for governed incidents, logs, configs, diagnostics, or conflicting source roles. Do not use for ordinary editing, memo/session work, direct publication, or durable-memory authority.
Shape one software responsibility boundary through bounded-context, core-boundary, or port-adapter mode. Use when responsibilities, reusable rules, orchestration, or concrete dependencies are entangled and a small owner-aware boundary is needed before implementation. Do not use for source-authority lookup, ordinary edits, test design, or a boundary that is already clear.
Turn one stable technical truth into bounded evidence through contract, coverage-audit, or property mode. Use to define a named consumer seam, audit what existing checks really constrain, or express a broad invariant after manual cases establish meaning. Compose with aoa-eval when an evaluation surface must first be found or applied. Do not use for undefined behavior, generic test plans, or green checks as whole-system proof.