메뉴
Generate and validate user stories from requirements with INVEST validation and acceptance criteria
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter --skill user-story-writer명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SKILL.md 표시 중
Reference for querying the Atlas knowledge graph through its MCP tools — the SECONDARY enrichment/comparison layer that adds best-practice context to systems you have ALREADY scanned from your real sources (`az`, repos, dirs). Use when you need to look up nodes, edges, kinds, clusters, stats, or wiki pages in Atlas to compare against your real inventory. (atlas graph, query atlas, atlas mcp, search the graph, graph neighbors, atlas record, atlas kinds, enrichment layer)
Atlas turns your STATED NEED into a real systems atlas by SCANNING your actual sources (Azure via `az`, git repos, local dirs) and process/data mining them, THEN enriching against the Atlas knowledge graph. Use this skill when asked to inventory/map your real systems, scan your cloud + repos + directories, mine the real processes or data they contain, or collect their real constraints/gotchas. (atlas, scan my systems, inventory our azure account, map my repos, real systems atlas, process mining, data mining, collect nuances, system discovery)
This skill should be used when the user asks to "find skills in the wild", "assimilate popular workflows", "discover SKILL.md files in repos", "research external skills", "find workflow patterns", "survey the skill landscape", "what skills exist out there", or wants to investigate public repositories for extractable processes, babysitter plugins, and reusable procedural insights. Searches GitHub for SKILL.md files, classifies repos by archetype, and maintains structured research under docs/reference-repos/.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | user-story-writer |
| description | Generate and validate user stories from requirements with INVEST validation and acceptance criteria |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Glob","Grep","Bash"] |
| metadata | {"specialization":"business-analysis","domain":"business","id":"SK-006","category":"Agile Requirements"} |
| graph | {"domains":["domain:business-intelligence"],"specializations":["specialization:strategic-consulting"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:requirements-engineering","skill-area:business-analysis","skill-area:agile-delivery"],"workflows":["workflow:market-analysis"],"roles":["role:business-analyst","role:product-owner"]} |
The User Story Writer skill provides specialized capabilities for creating, validating, and managing user stories from business requirements. This skill enables conversion of traditional requirements into agile user stories with proper structure, validation against INVEST criteria, and comprehensive acceptance criteria.
Convert these requirements to user stories:
[BRD requirements list]
Include persona identification and acceptance criteria for each story.
Validate these user stories against INVEST criteria:
[User story list]
Provide scores and improvement recommendations.
Split this epic into smaller user stories:
[Epic description]
Maintain value delivery and generate acceptance criteria for each.
Create a story map for this product:
[Product description and user activities]
Organize by user journey and define release slices.
This skill integrates with the following business analysis processes:
As a [type of user],
I want [some goal],
So that [some reason/benefit].
When [situation],
I want to [motivation],
So I can [expected outcome].
| Criterion | Description | Validation Question |
|---|---|---|
| Independent | Can be developed in any order | Does this story depend on other stories? |
| Negotiable | Details can be refined | Is there room for discussion? |
| Valuable | Delivers user/business value | What value does this provide? |
| Estimable | Can be sized | Can we estimate the effort? |
| Small | Fits in a sprint | Can it be completed in one sprint? |
| Testable | Has clear acceptance criteria | How will we know it's done? |
Given [precondition/context]
When [action/trigger]
Then [expected outcome]
And [additional outcome]
| Points | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Trivial, well-understood |
| 2 | Small, minor complexity |
| 3 | Medium, some unknowns |
| 5 | Medium-large, notable complexity |
| 8 | Large, significant unknowns |
| 13 | Very large, should consider splitting |
| 21+ | Epic, must be split |