Skip to main content
Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행
원클릭으로
AcidicSoil
GitHub 제작자 프로필

AcidicSoil

4개 GitHub 저장소에서 수집된 308개 skills를 저장소 단위로 보여줍니다.

수집된 skills
308
저장소
4
업데이트
2026-07-10
저장소 탐색

저장소와 대표 skills

이 저장소에서 수집된 skills 104개 중 상위 8개를 표시합니다.
이 저장소에서 수집된 skills 94개 중 상위 8개를 표시합니다.
이 저장소에서 수집된 skills 57개 중 상위 8개를 표시합니다.
skill-builder
소프트웨어 개발자

Create Claude Code skills with best practices, structure, validation, and testing. Use when designing or refining skills, prompts, references, or supporting files.

2026-04-27
artifact-analysis
프로젝트 관리 전문가

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

2026-04-18
brainstorm-beagle
프로젝트 관리 전문가

Use when the user has a fuzzy idea and wants to shape it into a concrete project spec before planning or building. Triggers on: "brainstorm this", "I have an idea for...", "help me think through this project", "what should I build", "spec this out". Also catches vague feature descriptions needing structured questioning to clarify scope. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, review strategy docs, or run strategy interviews — produces a WHAT/WHY spec through dialogue, not a HOW plan.

2026-04-18
prfaq-beagle
프로젝트 관리 전문가

Use when the user wants to pressure-test a product, internal-tool, or OSS concept against Amazon's Working Backwards PRFAQ gauntlet before committing to a spec. Triggers on: "work backwards", "write a PRFAQ", "press release first", "is this idea worth building", "pressure-test this concept", "filter this before brainstorm", "is this a real product". Also catches solution-first pitches ("I want to build X that does Y") and technology-first pitches ("use AI to...") that need customer-first filtering. Produces a binary pass/fail verdict, not a polished doc. Hardcore coaching — direct, skeptical, concrete. On pass, hands off to brainstorm-beagle with a concept brief. Does NOT write code, plan implementation, scaffold projects, or draft specs.

2026-04-18
web-research
고객 서비스 담당자

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

2026-04-18
gen-release-notes
소프트웨어 개발자

generate release notes for changes since a given tag

2026-04-18
resolve-beagle
프로젝트 관리 전문가

Use as the follow-up to brainstorm-beagle when a spec has an Open Questions section (or quietly carries latent gaps) that need closing before planning or implementation can begin. Triggers on: "resolve the open questions", "close the gaps in this spec", "research the open items", "finalize my spec", "make this spec implementation-ready", "answer the TBDs". Also triggers whenever the user points at a brainstorm-beagle spec and asks for research, proposals, or answers to unresolved items. Orchestrates parallel research subagents when available (falls back to inline sequential research otherwise), proposes answers one at a time for user approval, then rewrites the spec in place so it arrives at planning with no known gaps. Does NOT write code, design implementation, or create plans — it only produces a complete spec.

2026-04-18
ffi-code-review
소프트웨어 품질 보증 분석가·테스터

Reviews Rust FFI code for type safety, memory layout compatibility, string handling, callback patterns, and unsafe boundary correctness. Use when reviewing extern blocks, #[repr(C)] types, bindgen output, or code calling C/C++ libraries.

2026-04-12
이 저장소에서 수집된 skills 53개 중 상위 8개를 표시합니다.
저장소 4개 중 4개 표시
모든 저장소를 표시했습니다