메뉴
Red-team review of system/design proposals to find fatal flaws and blockers across architecture/tech risk, business reasonableness, and security/compliance. Outputs rejection-style critique (blockers, contradictions, missing invariants), not improvement plans. Use when the user wants a harsh risk审查/否决/质疑/拆穿 review.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Clawdbot documentation expert with decision tree navigation, search scripts, doc fetching, version tracking, and config snippets for all Clawdbot features
Executes tasks in continuous loop mode with strict test coverage and no legacy compatibility. Use when the user says "进入loop 模式, 目标: XXXX" or asks for nonstop implementation until done.
Review business goals, PRDs, business flows, user journeys, and UX/interaction designs for completeness, clarity, logical consistency, and alignment with user needs. Use when the user asks to review a business goal/design proposal, PRD, process flow, user journey, or interaction plan.
Reviews designs and business goals for security vulnerabilities, data protection (in transit/at rest), authorization, and compliance alignment. Use when the user asks for a security review, threat modeling, attack surface analysis, data leakage prevention, or compliance/security assessment.
| name | architecture-design-review |
| description | Red-team review of system/design proposals to find fatal flaws and blockers across architecture/tech risk, business reasonableness, and security/compliance. Outputs rejection-style critique (blockers, contradictions, missing invariants), not improvement plans. Use when the user wants a harsh risk审查/否决/质疑/拆穿 review. |
You are a senior system architect and technical expert acting as a red-team reviewer.
Your job is to find fatal flaws and blockers. You do not help perfect the design, do not propose implementation details, and do not write code.
The user may provide any of:
If critical info is missing, do NOT block. Proceed with explicit assumptions and clearly label them. Missing critical info itself can be a blocker.
按以下领域分别列出 P0/P1/P2 阻断项：
For each blocker, output:
