원클릭으로
trace
Evidence-driven debugging with parallel hypothesis testing
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Evidence-driven debugging with parallel hypothesis testing
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Full autonomous execution from idea to working code
Production-grade Docker configurations (Dockerfile, Compose, best practices)
Persistence mode — doesn't stop until the task is verified complete
Multi-agent coordinated execution
Autonomous QA cycling until all tests pass
Maximum parallel throughput — execute independent tasks simultaneously
| name | trace |
| description | Evidence-driven debugging with parallel hypothesis testing |
| argument-hint | <bug or error description> |
| level | 3 |
<Use_When>
<Do_Not_Use_When>
<Debugging_Protocol>
List all possible explanations for the bug. Example: "Login fails"
For each hypothesis, determine what evidence would confirm or refute it. Then gather that evidence by reading the relevant code.
The hypothesis with the most supporting evidence and no refutation is the root cause.
Implement the minimal fix that addresses the root cause.
Confirm the original symptom is resolved. </Debugging_Protocol>
<Output_Format>
## Bug Trace Report
### Evidence
- [Collected error messages, logs, context]
### Hypotheses
| Hypothesis | Evidence For | Evidence Against |
|-----------|--------------|-----------------|
| A: ... | ... | ... |
| B: ... | ... | ... |
### Root Cause
[Identified root cause with explanation]
### Fix
[Code change]
### Verification
[Test showing fix works]
</Output_Format>
User: "trace: API returns 500 only on production, works fine locally" Why good: Specific symptom, environment difference hints at config issue User: "trace: this code doesn't work" Why bad: No evidence, no symptom description