| name | stakeholder-update |
| description | Stakeholder communication assistant for status updates, progress reports, and executive summaries. Use when the user needs to write a stakeholder update, status report, progress summary, or any upward communication. Triggers include "stakeholder update", "status update", "progress report", "update leadership", "weekly update", or "executive summary". |
| argument-hint | ["project or team"] |
Stakeholder Update Skill
Instructions
Help create clear, concise stakeholder updates that communicate progress, risks, and asks effectively.
Behavior
- Lead with the headline — Don't bury the lead
- Use consistent structure — Same format builds trust
- Be honest about risks — Surface problems early
- Include clear asks — What do you need from them?
- Keep it scannable — Executives skim
Tone
- Confident but not arrogant
- Transparent about challenges
- Action-oriented
- Respectful of reader's time
Advanced Patterns
- The bad news sandwich is dead — Don't bury risks between good news. Executives see through it and lose trust. Instead, lead with the headline (good or bad), then immediately follow with what you're doing about it. "Android delivery dropped to 88%. Root cause identified, fix deploying Monday, ETA to recover: 2 weeks." Confidence comes from having a plan, not from hiding problems
- Metric trend > metric snapshot — A single number is noise. Three data points are a trend. Always show the direction: "Delivery rate: 94% (up from 89% last month, target 95%)." The reader can instantly assess: are we improving, stable, or declining? Without trend, they'll ask — and you'll look unprepared
- The "asks" section is the point — Most PMs treat the asks section as an afterthought. But the entire update exists to get your asks answered. If you have no asks, you're sending a status report — send it as an email. If you have asks, lead with them in the TL;DR: "On track for March launch. Need: decision on scope cut by Friday."
- Audience-calibrated detail — Your skip-level wants 3 bullets. Your manager wants a page. Your team wants the full picture. Don't write one update for three audiences. Write the full version, then create progressively shorter summaries. The TL;DR section should stand alone as a complete Slack message
- Consistency builds trust — Send updates on the same day, in the same format, at the same cadence. When stakeholders know what to expect, they read it. When the format varies, they skim or ignore. The best update format is the one you actually send every week, not the perfect template you use once
Update Structure
## [Project/Team] Update — [Date]
### TL;DR
One sentence summary. What's the single most important thing to know?
### Status: On Track / At Risk / Off Track
### Progress This Period
- [Completed item 1]
- [Completed item 2]
- [In progress item]
### Key Metrics
| Metric | Target | Actual | Trend |
|--------|--------|--------|-------|
| [Metric 1] | X | Y | up/down/flat |
### Risks & Blockers
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation | Owner |
|------|--------|------------|-------|
| [Risk 1] | [High/Med/Low] | [What we're doing] | [Who] |
### Asks
- [ ] [What you need from leadership]
### Next Period
- [ ] [What's coming next]
Principles
Headline First
Bad: "We had several meetings this week and discussed various topics..."
Good: "We're on track to launch March 1st. Key risk: Android testing capacity."
Specific Over Vague
Bad: "Good progress on performance"
Good: "Reduced P99 latency from 450ms to 180ms (-60%)"
Honest About Problems
Bad: "Minor delays expected"
Good: "Timeline at risk: 2-week slip likely due to API dependency. We need [specific help]."
Clear Asks
Bad: "Would be helpful to have more resources"
Good: "Requesting: 1 additional Android engineer for 3 weeks, or we slip by 2 weeks"
Examples
Example 1: Weekly Update
User: Help me write a weekly update for my team's work on push notification improvements.
Good Response:
Push Notifications Update — Week of Feb 10, 2026
TL;DR
Delivery rate hit 94% (target: 95%). Android token refresh fix deployed, monitoring results.
Status: At Risk
On track for delivery rate target, but Android reachability work is behind schedule.
Progress This Week
- Android token refresh fix deployed — Live for 10% of users, expanding Monday
- iOS delivery optimization — P99 latency down from 2.1s to 1.4s
- Rich media support — Design complete, engineering started (40% done)
- Quick reply buttons — Blocked on iOS 17 API approval
Key Metrics
| Metric | Target | This Week | Last Week | Trend |
|---|
| Delivery rate (iOS) | 95% | 96.2% | 95.8% | up |
| Delivery rate (Android) | 95% | 91.4% | 89.2% | up |
| P99 latency | <2s | 1.4s | 2.1s | up |
Risks & Blockers
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|
| Quick reply blocked on Apple | High | Escalated to partner team, ETA next week | Ahmed |
| Android engineer out sick | Med | Redistributing work, 3-day slip possible | Michelle |
Asks
- Decision needed: Should we launch rich media without quick reply, or wait?
- Escalation help: Apple approval taking 2+ weeks — can leadership contact reach out?
Next Week
Adjust anything?
Example 2: Executive Summary
User: Write an executive summary of our Q1 progress for leadership.
Good Response:
Client Messaging Q1 2026 — Executive Summary
Bottom Line
Strong Q1. Delivered 3 of 4 planned initiatives. Push delivery rate at 94% (target: 95%), with clear path to close the gap in Q2. Team velocity improved 20% after process changes.
What We Shipped
| Initiative | Status | Impact |
|---|
| Android token refresh | Shipped | +5% delivery rate, +2M reachable users |
| Push performance optimization | Shipped | -60% latency (2.1s to 0.8s) |
| Inbox redesign | Shipped | +15% inbox open rate |
| Rich media push | 70% | Slipped to Q2 (Apple approval delay) |
Key Metrics
| Metric | Q4 2025 | Q1 2026 | Target | Status |
|---|
| Push delivery rate | 89% | 94% | 95% | At Risk |
| Message success rate | 10% | 14% | 15% | At Risk |
| Team velocity (points/sprint) | 45 | 54 | 50 | On Track |
What Worked
- Focus on Android — Concentrated effort closed the iOS/Android delivery gap
- Process improvements — Async standups + clearer ownership = faster shipping
- Partner alignment — Early stakeholder involvement reduced late-stage churn
What Didn't
- Apple dependency — Underestimated approval timeline for new notification APIs
- Scope creep — Rich media grew 40% from original spec
- On-call burden — Team spent 15% of time on unplanned support
Q2 Priorities
- Close the delivery gap — 94% to 99% (Android token + FCM reliability)
- Ship rich media — Unblock Apple, launch by April
- Reduce support burden — Self-service tools for partners
Asks
- Headcount: Request 1 additional engineer for Q2 to maintain velocity
- Executive support: Apple escalation for notification APIs
- Decision: Invest in self-service tooling vs. dedicated support engineer?
Want me to adjust the framing or add more detail anywhere?
Example 3: Quick Status
User: I need a quick Slack update about a feature delay.
Good Response:
Quick update on [Feature]:
Status: 1-week delay (new target: Feb 22)
Why: Discovered edge case in Android 12+ that breaks the happy path. Fix is straightforward but needs testing.
Impact: No user-facing impact (feature not launched). Marketing aware and adjusting.
What we're doing:
- Fix ready for review today
- Full QA this week
- Still on track for Feb launch window
No action needed — will update if anything changes.
Good for Slack?
