report

name	report
description	Submit feedback to the template repo as a GitHub issue (bug, feature request, or confusion)
argument-hint	[short description - optional]

Report

You help the user submit feedback about the template to the upstream repo as a GitHub issue. Use this skill when the user says something like "this doesn't work", "I got stuck", "I wish this did X", or runs /report directly.

The target repo for issues is aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace (the template). Users who are working in their own fork should still file issues against the template, not their fork, so the author can triage across all users.

Input

The user may provide via $ARGUMENTS:

• A short description of the issue.
• Nothing (skill will prompt).

Workflow

1. Categorize the feedback

Ask in one AskUserQuestion (unless the category is obvious from the argument):

• Category:
  • Bug - something broke or produced wrong output
  • Confusion - I got stuck or couldn't figure out how to do something
  • Feature request - I want the template to do something it doesn't
  • Other feedback - appreciation, context, observation

2. Collect context

Prompt for:

• What happened / what you wanted: free text, 2-3 sentences.
• Which skill (if applicable): pick from a list of shipped skills, or "not skill-related".
• What you expected vs. what happened (for Bug / Confusion only).

Skip any field the user already provided in $ARGUMENTS.

3. Check if GitHub MCP is available

Look at the deferred tools list (or the MCP Servers Available section in CLAUDE.md). If any mcp__github__* tools are present, GitHub MCP is available.

4a. If GitHub MCP is available: open the issue directly

Use the GitHub MCP issue-creation tool with:

• Repo: aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace
• Title: [{Category}] {short description}. Example: [Bug] /meeting crashes when meeting note has no attendees.
• Body: use this template

## Category
{Bug | Confusion | Feature request | Other}

## What happened / what I wanted
{User's description}

## Which skill (if any)
{skill name or "not skill-related"}

## Expected vs. actual (bug / confusion only)
**Expected**: {user's expected outcome}
**Actual**: {what actually happened}

## Environment
- Template version / commit: {try to read from CHANGELOG.md top header; fallback "v2"}
- Claude Code version: {ask user if unknown}
- OS: {ask or infer}

---
Submitted via `/report` skill.

• Labels: from-report plus a category label (bug, confusion, feature, feedback). If those labels don't exist in the target repo, create them or skip silently.

Before opening the issue, show the full title and body to the user and ask for confirmation. This is a public artifact; they need a last-look.

4b. If GitHub MCP is not available: print a pre-filled URL

Construct a GitHub issue-URL that pre-fills the title and body. Format:

https://github.com/aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace/issues/new?title={url-encoded title}&body={url-encoded body}&labels=from-report,{category}

Show the URL to the user and instruct:

GitHub MCP isn't configured, so I can't open the issue for you directly.

Click this URL to open a pre-filled issue in your browser:

{URL}

If the URL is too long for your browser, here's the title and body to paste manually into https://github.com/aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace/issues/new :

Title: {title}

Body:
{body}

5. Confirmation

After the issue is filed (or the user has been shown the URL):

Thanks for the feedback!

[if MCP] Issue filed: {URL to new issue}
[if URL fallback] Once you've filed it, the maintainer will triage it and respond.

If you want to follow up, run `/report` again or reply to the issue on GitHub.

Privacy rules

• Never include vault content in the issue body. Only what the user explicitly wrote in response to the prompts.
• Never include file paths that contain the user's name or company. If a path is mentioned in the description, offer to redact it.
• Never attach file contents. If the bug requires a specific file to reproduce, ask the user to paste the minimal snippet that shows the bug, not the whole file.

Notes

• The skill targets the template repo (aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace), not the user's fork. That's deliberate - feedback should flow back to the author so all users benefit.
• Forks that want to collect their own feedback can edit this skill locally to change the target repo.
• If the user wants to file a private issue (e.g., because the feedback references sensitive customer data), tell them to contact the maintainer directly instead of filing a public issue.