메뉴
Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds).
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Compile a Beamer LaTeX slide deck with XeLaTeX (3 passes + bibtex). Use when compiling lecture slides.
Visual PDF regression test comparing current Beamer output against a baseline branch. Use when checking if slide changes introduced visual regressions.
Render Quarto slides and deploy to GitHub Pages via CI/CD. Use when deploying lecture slides after making changes.
Generate speaker notes (presentation script) for Quarto RevealJS slides. Supports English and Korean. Use when user asks to "write speaker notes", "add presentation script", "speaker script", "발표 스크립트", or "스피커 노트".
Extract TikZ diagrams from Beamer source, compile to PDF, convert to SVG with 0-based indexing. Use when updating TikZ diagrams for Quarto slides.
Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, technical methodology, citation completeness, and potential referee objections
| name | qa-quarto |
| description | Adversarial Quarto vs Beamer QA. Critic finds issues, fixer applies fixes, loops until APPROVED (max 5 rounds). |
| argument-hint | [PaperName] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Grep","Glob","Write","Edit","Bash","Task"] |
| context | fork |
Compare Quarto HTML slides against their Beamer PDF benchmark using an iterative critic/fixer loop.
Philosophy: The Beamer PDF is the gold standard. The Quarto translation must be at least as good in every dimension.
Phase 0: Pre-flight → Phase 1: Critic audit → Phase 2: Fixer → Phase 3: Re-audit → Loop until APPROVED (max 5 rounds)
| Gate | Condition |
|---|---|
| Overflow | NO content cut off |
| Plot Quality | Interactive charts >= static plots |
| Content Parity | No missing slides/equations/text |
| Visual Regression | Quarto >= Beamer in all dimensions |
| Slide Centering | Content centered, no jumping |
| Notation Fidelity | All math verbatim from Beamer |
Launch the quarto-critic agent to compare Beamer vs Quarto comprehensively. Report saved to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_critic_round1.md.
If not APPROVED, launch quarto-fixer agent to apply fixes (Critical → Major → Minor), re-render, and verify.
Re-launch critic to verify fixes. Loop back to Phase 2 if needed.
Max 5 fix rounds. After that, escalate to user with remaining issues.
Save to quality_reports/[Lecture]_qa_final.md with hard gate status, iteration summary, and remaining issues.