원클릭으로
gsd-discuss-phase
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, update or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
Use this skill when the user wants direct operations on an Obsidian vault: read or edit notes and daily notes, search vault contents, count or list notes, manage tasks, move or rename files, find orphaned notes or broken links, inspect frontmatter/properties, manage sync or file history, query Bases, manage bookmarks, script the CLI, or run JavaScript against the Obsidian API. Trigger when the request implies "go into my vault and do X"; the user wants action on vault data, not an explanation. Skip pure conceptual or GUI-help questions such as settings navigation, theme/plugin installation, sync troubleshooting, Dataview syntax, keyboard shortcuts, or parsing vault files with unrelated external scripts.
Captures corrections, failures, missing capabilities, and reusable discoveries in agent so future work improves. Use this skill whenever a command, tool, or API fails unexpectedly; the user corrects the agent; the agent realizes its knowledge is outdated or wrong; a missing capability is exposed; or a better recurring approach is discovered. Record the result under .agents/learnings/, review related entries before major tasks, and promote durable workflow rules into AGENTS.md when they should change future behavior.
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
| name | gsd-discuss-phase |
| description | Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. |
How it works:
Output: {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md — decisions clear enough that downstream agents can act without asking the user again
<execution_context> Workflow files are loaded on-demand in the section below — not upfront. Do not pre-load any workflow files before reading the mode routing instructions. </execution_context>
<runtime_note>
Copilot (VS Code): Use vscode_askquestions wherever this workflow calls question. They are equivalent — vscode_askquestions is the VS Code Copilot implementation of the same interactive question API.
</runtime_note>
Context files are resolved in-workflow using init phase-op and roadmap/state tool calls.
If --assumptions is in $ARGUMENTS:
Read and execute /home/aming/.config/opencode/gsd-core/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
Stop here.
Otherwise, if DISCUSS_MODE is "assumptions":
Read and execute /home/aming/.config/opencode/gsd-core/workflows/discuss-phase-assumptions.md end-to-end.
Otherwise ("discuss" / unset / any other value):
Read and execute /home/aming/.config/opencode/gsd-core/workflows/discuss-phase.md end-to-end.
MANDATORY: Read the appropriate workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The objective and success_criteria sections in this command file are summaries — the workflow file contains the complete step-by-step process with all required behaviors, config checks, and interaction patterns. Do not improvise from the summary.
Lazy loading: templates/context.md is loaded inside the write_context step of the active workflow. discuss-phase-power.md is loaded inside discuss-phase.md when --power is detected. Do not load either here.
<success_criteria>