원클릭으로
agentic-code-review
Use to review a diff against repository contracts, specs, docs, tests, and architecture boundaries.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use to review a diff against repository contracts, specs, docs, tests, and architecture boundaries.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
| name | agentic-code-review |
| description | Use to review a diff against repository contracts, specs, docs, tests, and architecture boundaries. |
Lead with findings. Prioritize:
DESIGN.mdAGENTS.md, DESIGN.md, and affected specs/docs.Valid findings should become:
Lead with findings ordered by severity. Include file references, the behavioral risk, and the smallest useful fix. Keep summaries secondary to actionable issues.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when adding, changing, or reviewing MCP servers, agent tools, provider integrations, credentials, scopes, or tool approval behavior.
Use when converting a product spec, use case, or PRD into a concrete implementation plan before code changes.
Use after incidents, regressions, repeated review findings, or completed features to convert lessons into durable factory improvements.
Use when a task requires meaningful implementation. Research the repo, inspect docs/specs, and create a concrete plan before editing code.
Use when splitting complex work into independent subagent tasks with clear ownership, evidence, and integration responsibilities.
Use when implementing behavior from an approved plan with test-first or regression-test-first development.