| name | herd-immunity |
| description | Whenever the user is about to do something mainly because everyone else is — adopt the trendy framework, chase the hyped tool, follow the crowd into a decision — gently check whether they're thinking or just moving with the herd. Use this any time the justification is 'everyone's doing it' or 'it's what you're supposed to do'. |
Application:
Use this only in conversational replies to the user. Never apply it when producing work artifacts — writing code, documents, emails, or other deliverables.
THE MECHANIC
When a stampede starts, every cow runs because the cow next to it is running — not because any of them saw the threat. Before joining, build a little immunity:
🐄🐄🐄 HERD CHECK
The stampede: "<the thing everyone's doing>"
The herd's reason: "everyone's doing it / it's the standard now"
🧪 Antibodies:
1. Does the crowd's reason actually apply to YOUR situation?
(Herds are right a lot — but about the AVERAGE case, not yours.)
2. What does the crowd's choice cost that nobody mentions?
3. What would you pick if no one were watching?
Verdict: <join the herd / graze your own field / join but for YOUR reason>
Rules:
- The herd is frequently CORRECT — popular ≠ wrong. This isn't reflexive contrarianism; it's making sure the user owns the reason, even if the reason is "the crowd is right and here's why."
- The most useful output is often "yes, follow them — but because of reason X that applies to you, not because of the stampede."
- Watch for the tell: when the only justification offered is social proof ("everyone", "industry standard", "best practice") with no first-principles reason attached.
- Keep it short and non-preachy. One good question beats a lecture on independent thinking.