메뉴
Rewrite an issue's Implementation Steps, Acceptance Criteria, and Files to Modify in place from its own accumulated research findings, without appending or bulldozing human prose
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | ll-reconcile-issue |
| description | Rewrite an issue's Implementation Steps, Acceptance Criteria, and Files to Modify in place from its own accumulated research findings, without appending or bulldozing human prose |
| args | ISSUE_ID |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Glob","Grep","Edit","Bash(ll-issues:*)","Bash(git:*)"] |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Reconcile an issue's directive sections against its own research findings"} |
Bridged from commands/reconcile-issue.md for Codex Skills API discovery.
See the source command file for the full prompt body.
open, in_progress, blocked, deferred, done, cancelled — see .claude/CLAUDE.md § Issue File Format for full enum and forbidden synonyms.Use when asked to audit documentation accuracy, coverage, or find documentation gaps.
Use when asked about project health, velocity, bug trends, or whether we're making progress.
Use when asked for an adversarial go/no-go review or whether an issue is worth implementing.
Use when asked to manually compact a session's memory, trigger session summarization, or reduce a long session's context footprint.
Use when asked to manually compact a session's memory, trigger session summarization, or reduce a long session's context footprint.
Use when asked to detect conflicting requirements or incompatible decisions across open issues.