원클릭으로
stop-slop
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Revise an academic paper sentence by sentence with the author, stripping AI writing tells (stop-slop) while preserving the author's own voice. Use this whenever the user wants to polish, tighten, edit, proofread, or "de-slop" a paper, manuscript, draft, abstract, or thesis chapter — especially when they want careful interactive sentence-level revision rather than a one-shot rewrite. Trigger on requests like "help me revise my paper", "clean up my draft", "make my writing sound less AI", "go through my abstract line by line", or when they hand over a .tex/.md/.txt paper to improve.
Wield Google's Gemini CLI as a powerful auxiliary tool for code generation, review, analysis, and web research. Use when tasks benefit from a second AI perspective, current web information via Google Search, codebase architecture analysis, or parallel code generation. Also use when user explicitly requests Gemini operations.
Scan this machine for the Miasma / Phantom Gyp ("TeamPCP") npm supply-chain compromise that plants backdoors in Claude Code (~/.claude/settings.json) and VS Code (.vscode/tasks.json). Use when the user asks to check if their PC/machine is infected, compromised, or affected by the npm/Claude Code backdoor attack, credential-stealing worm, or Shai-Hulud campaign.
Use when the user asks to run Codex CLI (codex exec, codex resume) or references OpenAI Codex for code analysis, code review, or automated editing
Collaborative multi-agent fix workflow using codex, gemini-cli, and an independent subagent. Use when the user asks to "collab fix", "multi-agent fix", or wants several AI tools to jointly analyze and fix a bug or task with cross-review.
Test-Driven Development debug workflow combined with multi-agent collab-fix. Use when the user asks to "TDD debug", "reproduce and fix with a test", or wants a bug fixed with a failing test written first and verified after the fix.
| name | stop-slop |
| description | Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells. |
| metadata | {"trigger":"Writing prose, editing drafts, reviewing content for AI patterns","author":"Hardik Pandya (https://hvpandya.com)"} |
Eliminate predictable AI writing patterns from prose.
Cut filler phrases. Remove throat-clearing openers, emphasis crutches, and all adverbs. See references/phrases.md.
Break formulaic structures. Avoid binary contrasts, negative listings, dramatic fragmentation, rhetorical setups, false agency. See references/structures.md.
Use active voice. Every sentence needs a human subject doing something. No passive constructions. No inanimate objects performing human actions ("the complaint becomes a fix").
Be specific. No vague declaratives ("The reasons are structural"). Name the specific thing. No lazy extremes ("every," "always," "never") doing vague work.
Put the reader in the room. No narrator-from-a-distance voice. "You" beats "People." Specifics beat abstractions.
Vary rhythm. Mix sentence lengths. Two items beat three. End paragraphs differently. No em dashes.
Trust readers. State facts directly. Skip softening, justification, hand-holding.
Cut quotables. If it sounds like a pull-quote, rewrite it.
Before delivering prose:
Rate 1-10 on each dimension:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|---|
| Directness | Statements or announcements? |
| Rhythm | Varied or metronomic? |
| Trust | Respects reader intelligence? |
| Authenticity | Sounds human? |
| Density | Anything cuttable? |
Below 35/50: revise.
See references/examples.md for before/after transformations.
MIT