원클릭으로 Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행

exploratory-pass

스타1

포크0

업데이트2026년 7월 6일 12:32

Use when performing acceptance-criteria-driven exploratory validation in a prepared QA workspace — manual-style checks, browser verification, or CLI probes against tasks.md Gherkin. Do NOT use for automated tests only (run-automated-suite) or defect formatting (document-defects).

설치

Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.

Manus에서 실행

출처

carinyaparc

carinyaparc/digital-agency

GitHub 저장소 열기 Creator 저장소 보기

다운로드

Manus에서 실행

Exploratory pass

AC-driven exploratory validation in the QA workspace. Maps to the delivery-qa crew exploratory step.

Follow prompts/run.prompt.md.

Pass epic slug or branch after the skill name.

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

같은 저장소

setup

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Web development practice setup interview — detects or creates .agency/target.json binding, reads instance profile from `/agency-hub:setup`, interviews tech stack, deployment platform, connectors, and persona preference (six engineering personas vs merged), writes practice profile. Use on first install after `/agency-hub:setup`, when the user says "set up web development" or "bind target repo", or to redo engineering defaults only.

2026-07-071

ralph

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Use when the user wants to run a Ralph loop: an autonomous, self-referential delivery loop that drives a whole epic through implement, code review, fix, UX review, validate, commit, and merge request, one task per iteration, until a completion promise is emitted (ralph setup, ralph start), or to inspect or stop a running loop (ralph status, ralph cancel). Also supports simple ad-hoc loops that repeat a single prompt until done. Do NOT use to implement a single task once (implement), review a diff (code-review), or sign off an epic (validate) — the loop orchestrates those skills.

2026-07-071

ux-design-review

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Use when the user wants a UX/design review of implemented UI — frontend components, pages, or flows — against the design source of truth (Figma via MCP, mockups, tokens, or style guide, whatever the repo provides), covering design fidelity, accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA), interaction states, responsiveness, and design-system conformity; or to address UX review findings (ux-design-review fix, optionally scoped to an action tier). Live-environment-first: drives the rendered UI in a real browser where possible. Works with any framework or design tooling. Do NOT use for code correctness/security review (code-review), to review a design.md document (design), or to implement features (implement).

2026-07-071

merge-request-review

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Use when the user is the reviewer of a merge request or pull request and wants it reviewed and the verdict published to the provider — inline comments on the right lines, threads resolved or replied to, and an approve / request-changes / comment decision. Handles first reviews and re-review rounds after the author pushes. Works with any codebase and any git provider — GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket — using MCP tools where available, provider CLIs otherwise. Do NOT use to review your own working diff before opening an MR (code-review), to open or babysit an MR (merge-request), or to implement changes (implement).

2026-07-071

merge-request

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Use when the user wants to open a merge request or pull request for the current branch (merge-request create — the default — with a generated title, description, labels, and reviewer suggestions), or to babysit an open MR/PR to a merge-ready state (merge-request babysit) by watching CI, review comments, and merge conflicts. Works with any codebase and any git provider — GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket — using MCP tools where available, provider CLIs otherwise, and plain git as a last resort. Do NOT use to review code or an MR as its reviewer (code-review, merge-request-review) or to implement changes (implement).

2026-07-071

code-review

carinyaparc/digital-agency

Use when the user wants a code review of a branch, PR, or diff against its acceptance criteria and declared scope (whatever form they take in this repo), or to address review feedback without changing behaviour (code-review fix, optionally scoped to a blocking or warning action tier). Works with any language, delivery process, or issue tracker. Do NOT use to implement code, sign off completion of a larger body of work, or review rendered UI/UX (design fidelity, accessibility — use ux-design-review).

2026-07-071

name	exploratory-pass
description	Use when performing acceptance-criteria-driven exploratory validation in a prepared QA workspace — manual-style checks, browser verification, or CLI probes against tasks.md Gherkin. Do NOT use for automated tests only (run-automated-suite) or defect formatting (document-defects).
license	MIT
allowed-tools	["Read","Shell","Glob","Grep"]
argument-hint	<epic-slug-or-branch>

name	exploratory-pass
description	Use when performing acceptance-criteria-driven exploratory validation in a prepared QA workspace — manual-style checks, browser verification, or CLI probes against tasks.md Gherkin. Do NOT use for automated tests only (run-automated-suite) or defect formatting (document-defects).
license	MIT
allowed-tools	["Read","Shell","Glob","Grep"]
argument-hint	<epic-slug-or-branch>