메뉴
Use for review, PR review, audit, self-review, and regression-risk work. Prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, architecture drift, redundancy, security risk, and verification gaps.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when the user asks for best practices, broader validation, GitHub/open-source comparison, official-doc verification, or warns against one-sided thinking. Also use before implementation when official API, framework, or project-pattern facts are needed to avoid rework.
Use before multi-file, unfamiliar, public-contract, or shared-behavior code changes to build a bounded impact set without reading the whole repository or editing from a single file view.
Route non-trivial coding work across target-state implementation, codebase impact, Superpowers, Context7, security review, PR workflow, and verification. Skip for tiny edits or simple reads.
Use before finalizing non-trivial design, architecture, configuration, or implementation decisions. Reduces sycophancy bias by independently evaluating proposals, surfacing risks, and presenting alternatives. Auto-triggers on design_or_config and complex_feature routes.
Use before architecture, configuration, workflow, dependency, or high-impact implementation decisions to align goals, constraints, options, tradeoffs, recommendation, acceptance criteria, and user confirmation. Skip for tiny obvious tasks.
Use for non-trivial code changes after the plan is confirmed. Enforces target-state implementation: minimal necessary scope, existing patterns, no avoidable MVP residue, no duplicate logic, synchronized callers/tests/types/errors/config, and verification.
| name | code-review |
| description | Use for review, PR review, audit, self-review, and regression-risk work. Prioritizes bugs, regressions, missing tests, architecture drift, redundancy, security risk, and verification gaps. |
Use Superpowers review workflows as the default methodology.
superpowers:requesting-code-review.superpowers:receiving-code-review.security-review.pr-workflow.Report findings first, ordered by severity. Focus on real bugs, regressions, security/privacy risks, broken contracts, missing tests, unnecessary complexity, duplicate logic, and target-state violations. If no issues are found, say so and mention remaining verification gaps.