메뉴
This skill should be used when the user asks to "assess our growth options," "where should our growth come from," "build a growth strategy," or has a portfolio of growth initiatives that need to be checked against a real growth target — not just sorted into categories.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Check installed community skills for updates. Shows a diff and requires explicit approval before applying. Use when the user says "check for updates", "update my skills", "anything new for my installed skills", or when invoked from the registry-sync agent.
Engagement-profile interview that recommends and installs a starter pack of community strategy skills. This IS the practice setup for the whole ecosystem — it asks what kind of strategist you are and recommends what to install first. Use on fresh install, when the user says "get me started" or "what should I install", or to re-run the integration-availability check after adding or removing an MCP connector.
Install a community skill from a watched registry. Reads the allowlist first, fetches, shows the RAW SKILL.md (not just a summary), runs structural trust checks, runs skills-qa, and only writes files after explicit user approval. Use when the user says "install [skill]", picks install from browse, or provides a direct skill URL.
Evaluate a skill against the Strategy Skill Design Framework — thirteen design parameters (including trust-surface, freshness, schema validation, and conflict detection), three strategy-specific failure modes, and a three-band verdict (Ready / Some Concern / Material Concerns). Use when deciding whether to trust a community skill before installing it, before deploying a first-party skill to your team, or whenever the user asks "should I trust this?" or "is this skill well-designed?". Runs automatically as part of /strategy-builder-hub:skill-installer.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "review our resource allocation," "are we funding the right things," "build a portfolio allocation view," or needs current spend, headcount, or management attention checked against strategic priority for misallocation.
This skill should be used when the user asks to "stress-test these synergies," "is this deal's synergy case realistic," or has a deal or partnership's projected synergies that need cost/revenue separation, evidence checks, and a base-rate haircut.
| name | assess-growth-vectors |
| description | This skill should be used when the user asks to "assess our growth options," "where should our growth come from," "build a growth strategy," or has a portfolio of growth initiatives that need to be checked against a real growth target — not just sorted into categories. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Grep, Glob |
| metadata | {"version":"0.3.0","owner":"corporate-strategy practice","review_cadence":"quarterly","work_shape":"hypothesis-driven-analysis","permission_tier":"advisory","output_class":"draft-for-review","sourcing_policy":"volatile-facts-must-be-sourced"} |
For strategy leads testing whether a portfolio of growth initiatives can realistically hit a stated target — arithmetic most growth plans skip.
INPUT NEEDED.| Input | If missing |
|---|---|
| Growth target (rate, horizon) | Halt — skill meaningless without target |
| Initiative list with stated upside | Ask; partial OK with gaps flagged |
| Practice profile | Read or [PROVISIONAL] |
No profile: state success-rate priors explicitly as [PROVISIONAL — argue in room]; all upside figures user-sourced.
hypothesis-driven-analysis): High = triangulated priors; Low = assumption-driven — label load-bearing assumptions.GROWTH TARGET: [rate] over [horizon]
INITIATIVES:
[Initiative] — [Core | Adjacent | Transformational] — Stated upside: [value] —
Success-rate prior: [X%] — Realistic contribution: [value]
TOTAL REALISTIC CONTRIBUTION: [sum] vs TARGET: [value] — GAP: [amount | none]
IF GAP EXISTS — OPTIONS:
1. [...]
Input: Target +$100M over 3 years. Three initiatives: core +$40M (prior 80%), adjacent +$80M (prior 40%), transformational +$120M (prior 15%).
Excerpt: Realistic sum $32M+$32M+$18M=$82M; GAP $18M. Options include shift mix toward core or extend horizon [review].
When a stable convention surfaces during this run (thresholds, naming, tone, output format, or recurring corrections), propose a profile update: show the exact diff against ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-strategy/corporate-strategy/CLAUDE.md (org-wide facts go to org-profile.md), ask for confirmation, and write only on yes. Only /corporate-strategy:practice-setup auto-applies a full profile write.
Follows plugin CLAUDE.md § Outputs. Next: allocate-resources for bet funding, or add initiatives.