원클릭으로
create-plan
Use when a feature or change needs an implementation plan with concrete tasks, file paths, and test steps before coding begins
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use when a feature or change needs an implementation plan with concrete tasks, file paths, and test steps before coding begins
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Use when a plan's PR is ready to merge — marks the plan completed, checks PR status, merges to main, and syncs local main
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute
Provides comprehensive code review guidance for React 19, Vue 3, Rust, TypeScript, Java, Python, C/C++, Go, and WASM. Helps catch bugs, improve code quality, and give constructive feedback through systematic analysis. Features detailed language-specific guides, severity classification, review techniques, and hard-stop protocol. Use when: reviewing pull requests, conducting PR reviews, code review, reviewing code changes, establishing review standards, mentoring developers, architecture reviews, security audits, checking code quality, finding bugs, giving feedback on code.
Use before any creative work - creating features, building components, or modifying behavior
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment
| name | create-plan |
| description | Use when a feature or change needs an implementation plan with concrete tasks, file paths, and test steps before coding begins |
Turn an approved design into a structured implementation plan with independent, commitable tasks.
Write for a dumb agent. The executing agent has no memory of your conversation, no knowledge of intent, and no ability to infer what you meant. Every task must be self-contained and complete enough that a capable but context-free agent can execute it without guessing. If something is ambiguous, spell it out. If something could be done multiple ways, specify which way. Leave nothing to interpretation.
Don't use when:
brainstorming firstThis skill expects an approved design spec. The spec comes from the conversation — it was already presented and approved during brainstorming. Do NOT read from a file unless one was explicitly saved earlier.
Write to docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature>.md:
# [Feature] Plan
**Goal:** One sentence
**Architecture:** 2-3 sentences
**Tech Stack:** Key technologies
---
### Task N: [Name]
**Context:**
A short paragraph explaining *why* this task exists, what problem it solves, and how it fits into the overall feature. Include any decisions already made and why. Do not assume the agent knows anything about the conversation.
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/file.ext`
- Modify: `exact/path/existing.ext`
- Test: `tests/path/test.ext`
**What to implement:**
A precise description of the change. Include:
- Exact function/struct/module names to add or modify
- Exact signatures, types, or field names where relevant
- Any specific logic, conditions, or edge cases to handle
- What NOT to change (if there's a risk of over-engineering)
**Steps:**
- [ ] Write failing test for [specific behavior] in `tests/path/test.ext`
- [ ] Run `[exact test command]`
- Did it fail with [expected error]? If it passed unexpectedly, stop and investigate why.
- [ ] Implement [specific thing] in `exact/path/file.ext`
- [ ] Run `[exact test command]`
- Did all tests pass? If not, fix the failures and re-run before continuing.
- [ ] Run `[exact format command]` (e.g. `cargo fmt`)
- Did it succeed? If not, fix and re-run before continuing.
- [ ] Run `[exact build command]` (e.g. `cargo build`)
- Did it succeed? If not, fix and re-run before continuing.
- [ ] Commit with message: "[suggested commit message]"
**Acceptance criteria:**
- [ ] [Specific, verifiable outcome]
- [ ] [Another specific outcome]
Each task must be independently commitable. The agent executing it has no context beyond what is written here — be exhaustive.
Dispatch the reviewer subagent to review the plan (use review type: "plan"). Fix issues (max 3 rounds).
Then update docs/plans/README.md:
CRITICAL: Do NOT begin implementing any tasks in the plan. The create-plan skill ends once the plan is vetted and presented to the user. You must wait for explicit user approval before transitioning to implementation/execution.
Then tell the user the plan is ready and ask them to say when they're ready to start implementing:
"The implementation plan is ready. When you're ready, just say the word and I'll load the
execute-planskill to turn this spec into an implementation plan."
When the user confirms, load the execute-plan skill and invoke it — do not start planning on your own. The execute-plan skill handles the entire planning process.
Clear the todo list — use manage_todo_list to remove all entries now that planning is complete.
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Tasks that depend on each other's uncommitted work | Make each task independently commitable |
| Vague file paths ("update the config") | Use exact paths: src/config/auth.ts |
| Skipping TDD steps in task template | Every task needs failing test → implement → pass |
| Planning before design is agreed | Use brainstorming first to align on approach |
| Too many tasks (10+) | Group related changes; aim for 3-7 tasks |