메뉴
Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | written-critique |
| description | Write a structured design review that someone can act on without follow-up questions. Use when giving async design feedback, writing portfolio case studies, or documenting design decisions. |
Write feedback someone can act on without asking you to clarify.
/written-critique Apply structured critique format to design reviews in this conversation.Build taste through volume of output, deliberate failure, and speed. Taste cannot be developed by watching. It's sharpened by making, failing, and making again. Use when designing practice routines, breaking through creative blocks, or helping someone move from analysis to execution.
Use taste as a competitive moat and business advantage. In the AI and vibe-coding era, execution is commoditized. Taste is the defensible edge. Use when advising founders on product differentiation, building product culture, evaluating why some products win despite fewer features, or understanding taste as a strategic asset.
Navigate the gap between what you can see and what you can make. The Ira Glass gap. Use when a designer is frustrated by the distance between their taste and their output, when mentoring someone through a creative plateau, or when someone is considering quitting because their work doesn't match their vision.
Structured exposure habits for building taste through relentless, intentional consumption. Not passive scrolling. Active intake across design, architecture, film, music, food, and culture. Use when building a taste practice, advising on professional development, or diagnosing why someone's design range feels narrow.
Notice what's deliberately missing from a design. Restraint is a taste signal. Use when studying minimalist products, evaluating design maturity, or understanding the power of removal.
Reverse-engineer why a design decision was made. Move from observation to inference. Use when studying products you admire, learning from competitors, or building analytical design thinking.