원클릭으로
gsd-inbox
Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
Generate an AI-SPEC.md design contract for phases that involve building AI systems.
Autonomous audit-to-fix pipeline — find issues, classify, fix, test, commit
Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
Cross-phase audit of all outstanding UAT and verification items
Run all remaining phases autonomously — discuss→plan→execute per phase
| name | gsd-inbox |
| description | Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines. |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Triage and review open GitHub issues and PRs against project templates and contribution guidelines."} |
<codex_skill_adapter>
$gsd-inbox.$gsd-inbox as {{GSD_ARGS}}.{{GSD_ARGS}} as empty.GSD workflows use AskUserQuestion (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex request_user_input:
Parameter mapping:
header → headerquestion → question"Label" — description → {label: "Label", description: "description"}id from header: lowercase, replace spaces with underscoresBatched calls:
AskUserQuestion([q1, q2]) → single request_user_input with multiple entries in questions[]Multi-select workaround:
multiSelect. Use sequential single-selects, or present a numbered freeform list asking the user to enter comma-separated numbers.Execute mode fallback:
request_user_input is rejected or unavailable, you MUST stop and present the questions as a plain-text numbered list, then wait for the user's reply. Do NOT pick a default and continue (#3018).--auto or --all),
(b) the user has explicitly approved a specific default for this question, or
(c) the workflow's documented contract says defaults are safe (e.g. autonomous lifecycle paths).GSD workflows use Task(...) (Claude Code syntax). Translate to Codex collaboration tools:
Direct mapping:
Task(subagent_type="X", prompt="Y") → spawn_agent(agent_type="X", message="Y")Task(model="...") → omit. spawn_agent has no inline model parameter;
GSD embeds the resolved per-agent model directly into each agent's .toml
at install time so model_overrides from .planning/config.json and
~/.gsd/defaults.json are honored automatically by Codex's agent router.fork_context: false by default — GSD agents load their own context via <files_to_read> blocksTask(isolation="worktree") / Agent(isolation="worktree") → no direct Codex mapping.
Codex spawn_agent does not create or bind a git worktree automatically.
Workflows that require this isolation must fail closed or use an explicit
manual worktree protocol before spawning (#3360).Spawn restriction:
spawn_agent to cases where the user has explicitly
requested sub-agents. When automatic spawning is not permitted, do the
work inline in the current agent rather than attempting to force a spawn.Parallel fan-out:
wait(ids) for all to completeResult parsing:
CHECKPOINT, PLAN COMPLETE, SUMMARY, etc.close_agent(id) after collecting results from each agent
</codex_skill_adapter>Flow: Detect repo → Fetch open issues + PRs → Classify each by type → Review against template → Report findings → Optionally act (label, comment, close)
<execution_context> @/Users/lmarques/Dev/efx-mux/.codex/get-shit-done/workflows/inbox.md </execution_context>
**Flags:** - `--issues` — Review only issues (skip PRs) - `--prs` — Review only PRs (skip issues) - `--label` — Auto-apply recommended labels after review - `--close-incomplete` — Close issues/PRs that fail template compliance (with comment explaining why) - `--repo owner/repo` — Override auto-detected repository (defaults to current git remote) Execute end-to-end. Parse flags from arguments and pass to workflow.