원클릭으로
literature-review
Use to organize source-backed literature review, synthesis notes, and evidence gaps.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use to organize source-backed literature review, synthesis notes, and evidence gaps.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
ARS-derived manuscript review skill for multi-perspective academic critique, methodology review, revision risk analysis, and re-review in DevNexus-Research.
ARS-derived academic paper writing skill for planning, drafting, revising, citation checking, disclosure, and LaTeX-oriented manuscript work in DevNexus-Research.
ARS-derived academic pipeline orchestrator for research-to-paper workflows, integrity gates, review, revision, and handoff in DevNexus-Research.
Use to check whether claims, citations, sources, and bibliography state align.
ARS-derived deep research skill for guided scoping, literature review, evidence synthesis, fact-checking, and systematic review work inside DevNexus-Research projects.
Use to draft, edit, inspect, or diagnose LaTeX manuscripts in an approved scope.
| name | literature-review |
| description | Use to organize source-backed literature review, synthesis notes, and evidence gaps. |
Use this skill to synthesize known sources, plan source acquisition, identify gaps, and connect literature to research questions without losing provenance.
Artifact mutation only for review notes, source manifests, and synthesis artifacts when authorized. Do not rewrite manuscript prose unless routed to paper planning or LaTeX authoring.
Every substantive summary should point to a source manifest entry, bibliography key, or user-provided excerpt. Flag claims that depend on unread, unavailable, or low-confidence sources. Do not fabricate citations or quote text that was not supplied.
The human researcher approves source inclusion, exclusion, interpretation, and the level of confidence before synthesis becomes manuscript argumentation.