관련 직업SOC
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/fabioc-aloha/Alex_Plug_In --skill grant-writing명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | grant-writing |
| description | Translate research vision into funded reality. |
| tier | extended |
| applyTo | **/*grant*,**/*funding*,**/*proposal*,**/*nsf*,**/*nih*,**/*research* |
Translate research vision into funded reality.
A grant proposal is a persuasion document. You're convincing reviewers that your research is important, your approach is sound, and you're the right person to do it.
Answer all three. Clearly. Early.
The most important page. Reviewers decide here.
Structure:
Template:
[Problem statement establishing significance]. Despite [current state of knowledge], [the gap] remains unaddressed. We hypothesize that [your central hypothesis]. To test this, we will: Aim 1: [specific objective]. Aim 2: [specific objective]. This work will [impact statement].
# Sample 3-year budget (NSF format)
budget:
year_1:
personnel:
- role: "PI (2 months summer)"
amount: 24000
- role: "Graduate RA (12 months)"
amount: 35000
fringe_benefits: 17700 # 30% of salaries
equipment: 15000 # Specialized hardware
supplies: 5000
travel: 3000 # 1 conference
indirect: 42280 # 52% MTDC
total: 141980
total_request: 425940
justification: |
PI will supervise graduate student and conduct analysis.
Equipment: Neural network training workstation essential for Aim 2.
Travel: Present findings at ACM CHI.
Start with the most important information:
| Weak | Strong |
|---|---|
| "It is believed that..." | "We will test whether..." |
| "Studies will be performed" | "We will conduct experiments" |
| "This may lead to..." | "This will demonstrate..." |
| Mistake | Fix |
|---|---|
| Burying the significance | Lead with impact |
| Too much jargon | Write for educated non-expert |
| Vague aims | Make aims specific and measurable |
| No preliminary data | Pilot studies, even small ones |
| Ignoring page limits | Ruthless editing |
| No alternatives | "If X fails, we will Y" |
| Weak budget justification | Every dollar explained |
| Missing required sections | Use the checklist |
Map your writing to review criteria:
| Criterion | Where to Address |
|---|---|
| Significance | Specific Aims, Significance section |
| Innovation | Specific Aims, Innovation section |
| Approach | Research Plan, each aim |
| Investigator | Biosketch, Team section |
| Environment | Resources, Letters of support |
Key insight: Reviewers are tired, busy experts. Make it EASY to find your strengths.
| Weeks Before | Task |
|---|---|
| 12+ | Start Specific Aims draft |
| 10 | Circulate Aims for feedback |
| 8 | First draft of full proposal |
| 6 | Internal review |
| 4 | Major revisions complete |
| 2 | Final polish, budget finalized |
| 1 | Institutional review |
| 0 | Submit (never day-of!) |
Most grants don't fund on first try. Resubmissions:
Create and maintain ASCII visual dashboards for project tracking with parallel lane progress bars
Store and manage voice samples for TTS cloning — portable, version-controlled audio references
Clear documentation through visual excellence