원클릭으로 Manus에서 모든 스킬 실행

lit-review

스타0

포크0

업데이트2026년 6월 9일 22:28

Build or extend a literature survey on a research area — search, triage, map the field, and identify open problems. Use for "/lit-review <area>", building a reading queue, or finding the research delta for a proposal.

설치

Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.

Manus에서 실행

출처

fingerskier

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

GitHub 저장소 열기 Creator 저장소 보기

다운로드

Manus에서 실행

SKILL.md

readonly

name	lit-review
description	Build or extend a literature survey on a research area — search, triage, map the field, and identify open problems. Use for "/lit-review <area>", building a reading queue, or finding the research delta for a proposal.

Literature Review

Build a literature map for the area in the arguments, producing a survey document under research/reading-lists/ (queue + map) and, when requested, a full written survey under research/.

Building the map

Seed — start from papers the user already has in research/paper-notes/, the seminal-papers lists in the relevant curriculum/ module, and (if web access is available) recent surveys and the citation graph around them.
Triage — for each candidate paper record one line: claim, method family, venue/year, and why it's in or out. Target a queue of 20–50 papers organized into 3–6 thematic clusters, not a flat list.
Map structure — for each cluster identify: the founding paper, the current state of the art, the standing disagreement (every live field has one), and what evidence would settle it.
Delta hunting — the survey's job is to end in open problems. For each cluster, state: what's underexplored, why (hard? unfashionable? recently unblocked?), and a feasible 12-week problem slice per the Phase 3 criteria in milestones/roadmap.md.

Quality bar

Every claim about a paper must be checkable — cite the specific paper, never "studies show".
Coverage honesty: explicitly list what the survey does not cover and why the boundary is drawn there.
Recency check: if the newest paper in a cluster is >2 years old, either justify the cluster as settled or flag the search as incomplete.

Outputs

research/reading-lists/<area>.md — clustered, annotated queue with priorities.
Each deep-read paper gets its own note via the /paper workflow.
Full survey (when requested): problem framing → cluster-by-cluster synthesis → comparison table → open problems ranked by value/feasibility. Have the skeptical-reviewer agent attack the draft before calling it done.

이 저장소의 다른 Skills

같은 저장소

advisor

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Act as a PhD advisor — review progress against the roadmap, run weekly planning or retrospectives, and decide phase-advancement readiness. Use for "/advisor", weekly check-ins, "am I ready for Phase 2?", or when feeling stuck/unfocused.

2026-06-090

flashcards

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Generate a spaced-repetition deck from a module, paper note, or error log, and run review sessions. Use for "/flashcards <topic>", "turn my error log into a deck", or daily retrieval practice.

2026-06-090

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Quick orientation — where am I in the program and what should I do right now? Use for "/next", "what should I work on?", "where was I?", or when a new learner doesn't know where to start. For full planning meetings use /advisor instead.

2026-06-090

oral-exam

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Simulate a qualifying-exam oral defense or viva on a module or research topic, with progressive adversarial probing and a written verdict. Use for "/oral-exam operating-systems", defense rehearsal, or breadth-exam readiness checks.

2026-06-090

paper

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Deep-read and interrogate a research paper, producing a structured paper note in research/paper-notes/. Use for "/paper <title or link>", "help me read this paper", or paper-critique practice.

2026-06-090

proposal

fingerskier/CSAI_PhD

Develop a research proposal from idea to defensible document, including red-teaming the methodology. Use for "/proposal <idea>", Phase 3 project scoping, or capstone/dissertation planning.

2026-06-090

name	lit-review
description	Build or extend a literature survey on a research area — search, triage, map the field, and identify open problems. Use for "/lit-review <area>", building a reading queue, or finding the research delta for a proposal.

Literature Review

Build a literature map for the area in the arguments, producing a survey document under research/reading-lists/ (queue + map) and, when requested, a full written survey under research/.

Building the map

Seed — start from papers the user already has in research/paper-notes/, the seminal-papers lists in the relevant curriculum/ module, and (if web access is available) recent surveys and the citation graph around them.
Triage — for each candidate paper record one line: claim, method family, venue/year, and why it's in or out. Target a queue of 20–50 papers organized into 3–6 thematic clusters, not a flat list.
Map structure — for each cluster identify: the founding paper, the current state of the art, the standing disagreement (every live field has one), and what evidence would settle it.
Delta hunting — the survey's job is to end in open problems. For each cluster, state: what's underexplored, why (hard? unfashionable? recently unblocked?), and a feasible 12-week problem slice per the Phase 3 criteria in milestones/roadmap.md.

Quality bar

Every claim about a paper must be checkable — cite the specific paper, never "studies show".
Coverage honesty: explicitly list what the survey does not cover and why the boundary is drawn there.
Recency check: if the newest paper in a cluster is >2 years old, either justify the cluster as settled or flag the search as incomplete.

Outputs

research/reading-lists/<area>.md — clustered, annotated queue with priorities.
Each deep-read paper gets its own note via the /paper workflow.
Full survey (when requested): problem framing → cluster-by-cluster synthesis → comparison table → open problems ranked by value/feasibility. Have the skeptical-reviewer agent attack the draft before calling it done.