implement

name	implement
description	Generate correct, minimal, maintainable code that satisfies a validated Story's acceptance criteria against an execution plan. Activate when a Story is validated, a plan exists, and all prerequisites are unambiguous.
license	ELv2
compatibility	Works with any filesystem-based AI coding agent
metadata	{"author":"gaai-framework","version":"1.0","category":"delivery","track":"delivery","id":"SKILL-IMPLEMENT-001","updated_at":"2026-02-26T00:00:00.000Z","status":"stable"}
inputs	["contexts/artefacts/stories/** (validated)","contexts/artefacts/plans/**","contexts/rules/**","memory_context_bundle"]
outputs	["code_changes","test_artifacts","implementation_report"]

Implementation

Purpose / When to Activate

Activate when:

• A Story is validated for implementation
• An execution plan exists decomposing the Story into actionable steps
• Relevant memory, rules, and constraints are available

Only proceed when all prerequisites are present and unambiguous.

---

Process

1. Load context — retrieve minimal memory, load applicable rules and constraints

1a. Check contracted skills from the plan — If the execution plan contains a contracted skill step (from required_skills): - The platform delivery skills (implement, qa-review, etc.) remain authoritative and are not replaced or overridden. - Invoke the contracted skill step as specified in the plan, on top of the platform backbone. - Record in the implementation report which contracted skill was invoked and which bound output AC it targets. - If the plan contains no contracted skill step (because required_skills was empty/absent), do NOT introduce any custom skill. The implementation proceeds on the platform backbone only.

**Out-of-contract guard (hard, no exceptions):** IMPL MUST NOT introduce, discover, or
invoke any custom skill that was not contracted in the story's `required_skills` and
emitted as an explicit step in the plan. Introducing an out-of-contract custom skill is a
scope violation — QA will FAIL it.

2. Interpret acceptance criteria — translate into specific expected behaviors, validate against plan 3. Map plan to implementation — determine file paths, naming, modules per conventions; clarify dependency edges 4. Generate code — write code per plan steps, annotate links to acceptance criteria, respect all style/architecture/quality rules 5. Generate tests — cover expected behavior from acceptance criteria, include required edge cases, ensure automatable 6. Internal validation — verify acceptance criteria map to code/tests, run linting if required by rules, confirm memory constraints respected 7. Produce delivery outputs — code changes, test artifacts, implementation report

---

Output Definitions

code_changes — diffs or code fragments structured for integration

test_artifacts — test files (unit/integration) aligned with acceptance criteria

implementation_report — human-readable summary including:

• Mapping to plan steps
• Rules applied
• Memory constraints referenced
• Known risks and decisions

---

Quality Checks

• All acceptance criteria are met
• All rule checks pass
• Relevant tests exist and are runnable
• Implementation report articulates decisions
• Scope is unchanged
• Error-prone operations (I/O, parsing, external calls) have explicit error handling — failures are surfaced, not silently swallowed
• Functions exposed to external input validate arguments before executing
• Identifiers are explicit and intention-revealing — no single-letter variables, no ambiguous abbreviations outside established conventions
• Each function or module has a single, clear responsibility — if it does more than one thing, it must be decomposed

---

Non-Goals

This skill must NOT:

• Redefine product intent
• Add unrequested features
• Bypass governance rules
• Guess missing requirements
• Embed hidden context or implicit assumptions
• Introduce, discover, or invoke any custom skill not contracted via required_skills and emitted as an explicit step in the execution plan

"I implement exactly what the plan defines, and I prove it."