원클릭으로
lint
Run the lint pipeline and fix issues with judgment. Don't sweep errors under the rug.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Run the lint pipeline and fix issues with judgment. Don't sweep errors under the rug.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Build or refine harness context - skills, runbooks, or specs. Interview for shape, identify the right layer, study existing files for voice, draft, iterate.
Sign the Firefox Browser Bridge extension via Mozilla AMO
Record progress - update by default, complete a topic with "done", record everything with "full".
Orient a new session — load memories, announce on the roster, follow memory pointers, report what you see
Name and describe unnamed Claude Code sessions, one at a time with confirmation.
Draft a commit message for the current changes.
| name | lint |
| description | Run the lint pipeline and fix issues with judgment. Don't sweep errors under the rug. |
Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/doc/ai/runbook/lint.md for invocation, the tool
pipeline, spec pointers, and architecture docs. What
follows here is how to hold the fixes.
Separate obvious fixes from judgment calls. Obvious fixes (unused imports, spacing, naming drift) - just fix them. Judgment calls - surface them. When the convention doesn't cover the case, or the fix isn't clear, present the finding and the options before changing anything.
Findings the linter can't resolve are decisions, not facts. "Cannot de-alias", "cannot fix", informational reports that survive a lint pass - each one is a question, not a conclusion. Present them one at a time. Don't batch them, don't declare them permanent, don't categorize them as acceptable without input.
Don't suppress errors with _. Only byte counts
get the blank identifier, never error returns. If the
error genuinely can't happen, explain why.
Don't add lint-ignore annotations. No //nolint,
no //lint:ignore. If the linter is wrong, the fix is
in the code or in the analyzer - not in a comment.
Don't invent conventions. When a lint finding reveals a gap - a pattern the conventions don't address - flag it. That's a decision, not a fix.