원클릭으로
nexus
RAG architectures, agent design patterns, prompt engineering, and LLM evaluation — domain expertise for AI application engineers
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
RAG architectures, agent design patterns, prompt engineering, and LLM evaluation — domain expertise for AI application engineers
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Store and retrieve patterns from past work using semantic search; adds self-learning capability to Superpowers
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Select optimal subagent topology (hierarchical, mesh, ring, star) based on task structure; adds Ruflo-style swarm intelligence to Superpowers
Structured first-pass exploration of an unfamiliar codebase — what to read, in what order, what to map, what traps to find. Use when entering any new or inherited project before writing code.
Select optimal AI model by task complexity — route to cheap/fast models for simple tasks, capable models for complex reasoning
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions
| name | nexus |
| description | RAG architectures, agent design patterns, prompt engineering, and LLM evaluation — domain expertise for AI application engineers |
| type | domain |
NEXUS — A nexus is the central point where all connections converge. When invoked: assesses system type (RAG / agent / prompt / evaluation), loads the relevant pattern file, and applies AI-specific engineering discipline — hallucination guards, context budgets, injection defenses, cost tracking.
Core principle: LLM applications have unique failure modes — hallucination, prompt injection, context overflow, cost explosion. Engineer systems, not just prompts.
Announce at start: "Running NEXUS for AI application patterns."
SYSTEM TYPE ASSESSMENT:
"What are you building/debugging?"
A) RAG / knowledge retrieval system
B) Autonomous agent / tool-using agent
C) Prompt engineering / LLM integration
D) LLM evaluation / benchmarking
E) Multi-agent system
F) Debugging a hallucination / quality problem
G) Cost/latency optimization
Type → Section mapping:
huntervector skillAfter identifying type, ask: "What model are you using and what's the context window limit?"
Load patterns: patterns/rag-architecture.md
Key decisions in order:
Rule: Test retrieval quality (precision/recall) before testing generation quality.
Load patterns: patterns/agent-patterns.md
| Pattern | Best For | Iteration Limit |
|---|---|---|
| ReAct | Factual QA, tool use | 10 |
| Plan-Execute | Multi-step tasks | 5 plans |
| Reflection | Quality-critical output | 3 cycles |
| Multi-Agent Debate | High-stakes decisions | 3 rounds |
| Tool Routing | Multiple specialized tools | N/A |
Always set max iteration limits. Agents without limits will loop indefinitely on failure.
Load patterns: patterns/prompt-engineering.md
Process:
Rule: Never deploy a prompt tested on fewer than 10 diverse examples.
Load patterns: patterns/llm-evaluation.md
| Metric type | Method | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| Exact match | string equality | Factual QA, code gen |
| F1 score | token overlap | Extractive QA |
| Semantic similarity | cosine >0.8 | Open-ended QA |
| Rubric-based | LLM grades | Complex tasks |
| Hallucination | fact verification + self-consistency | High-stakes output |
| Human preference | blind A/B, win rate >0.55 | Model comparison |
Cost budgets: p99 latency <5s, cost per 1k requests <$10.
Never:
Always:
| Skill | Integration |
|---|---|
forge | Write eval tests before model/prompt changes |
hunter | Debug hallucination, retrieval failures |
sentinel | Verify eval metrics before claiming success |
chronicle | Store prompt patterns that worked |
vector | Route queries to appropriate model tier |