| name | report-generation |
| description | Audit report formatting, severity scoring, scorecard computation, and compliance export for document accessibility audits. Use when generating DOCUMENT-ACCESSIBILITY-AUDIT.md reports, computing document severity scores (0-100 with A-F grades), creating VPAT/ACR compliance exports, or formatting remediation priorities. |
Report Generation
Report File
Default output: DOCUMENT-ACCESSIBILITY-AUDIT.md in the project root.
Required Sections
Every audit report MUST include these sections:
- Audit Information — date, auditor, profile, scope, counts
- Executive Summary — totals, pass rate, most common issue, effort estimate
- Cross-Document Patterns — recurring issues, systemic failures
- Findings by File — per-document issues with rule ID, severity, location, WCAG, impact, remediation
- Findings by Rule (Cross-Reference) — rule-level aggregation across files
- What Passed — acknowledge clean documents and categories
- Remediation Priority — ordered by impact (Immediate / Soon / When Possible)
- Accessibility Scorecard — per-document scores and grades
- Metadata Dashboard — document properties health
- Confidence Summary — breakdown by confidence level
Optional Sections (include when applicable)
- Template Analysis — when batch scanning detects shared templates
- Comparison Report — when re-scanning against a baseline
- CI/CD Recommendations — when no config files exist
Severity Scoring Formula
Document Score = 100 - (sum of weighted findings)
Weights:
Error (high confidence): -10 points
Error (medium confidence): -7 points
Error (low confidence): -3 points
Warning (high confidence): -3 points
Warning (medium confidence):-2 points
Warning (low confidence): -1 point
Tips: 0 points
Floor: 0 (minimum score)
Score Grades
| Score | Grade | Meaning |
|---|
| 90-100 | A | Excellent — minor or no issues |
| 75-89 | B | Good — some warnings, few errors |
| 50-74 | C | Needs Work — multiple errors |
| 25-49 | D | Poor — significant accessibility barriers |
| 0-24 | F | Failing — critical barriers, likely unusable with AT |
Organization Modes
| Mode | Description | Best For |
|---|
| By file | Group all issues under each document | Small batches (< 10 files) |
| By issue type | Group all instances of each rule across documents | Seeing patterns |
| By severity | Critical first, then serious, moderate, minor | Prioritizing fixes |
VPAT/ACR Compliance Export
Conformance Levels
| Level | Criteria |
|---|
| Supports | No findings for this WCAG criterion across any document |
| Partially Supports | Some documents pass, some fail |
| Does Not Support | All or most documents fail |
| Not Applicable | Criterion does not apply to scanned document types |
Supported VPAT Editions
- VPAT 2.5 (WCAG) — maps to WCAG 2.2 criteria
- VPAT 2.5 (508) — maps to Revised Section 508 standards
- VPAT 2.5 (EN 301 549) — maps to EU accessibility directive
- VPAT 2.5 (INT) — International edition (all three combined)
Remediation Tracking
When comparing against a baseline audit report:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|
| Fixed | Issue was in previous report but is now resolved |
| New | Issue was not in previous report but appears now |
| Persistent | Issue remains from previous report |
| Regressed | Issue was previously fixed but has returned |
Progress Metrics
- Issue reduction percentage:
(fixed / previous_total) * 100
- Score change:
current_score - previous_score
- Documents improved: count of documents with higher scores
