| name | mckinsey-critic |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| description | `/mckinsey-critic` reviews decks, memos, outlines, and strategies like a
consulting engagement manager: grade, section issues, top fixes, and what to
preserve.
|
| allowed-tools | ["Read","AskUserQuestion"] |
/mckinsey-critic
Inputs
Ask for the document, deck outline, memo, or strategy to review. If audience or goal is missing, ask before grading.
Output
Return:
- Grade: Green, Yellow, or Red
- One-line verdict
- Section-by-section review table
- Top 3 fixes ranked by impact
- One thing that works and should be protected
Review Criteria
- Structure: argument flow and section order
- Rigor: evidence, numbers, fair comparisons
- So-what: clear takeaway per section
- Completeness: options, owners, dates, risks
Process
- Grade against the intended audience and goal.
- Lead with the highest-impact problems.
- Make fixes specific enough to execute.
- Do not rewrite everything unless asked.
References
Read references/rubric.md for full rubric details and common problems.