원클릭으로
review-pr
Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Add a new public API method to the Refold SDK with types, JSDoc, and endpoint mapping. Use when adding new SDK functionality.
Code style and formatting conventions for this codebase. Reference this when writing or reviewing code to ensure consistency.
Verify code quality, catch bugs, and validate implementation against codebase patterns. Use for testing, linting, type-checking, and manual review.
| name | review-pr |
| description | Review a pull request for code quality, patterns consistency, and potential issues. Use when asked to review a PR by number or URL. |
| metadata | {"author":"iamtraction","version":"1.0.0","argument-hint":"<pr-number-or-url>"} |
Perform a thorough code review of a GitHub pull request.
The user provides a PR number or URL (e.g., 123, https://github.com/gocobalt/refold-js/pull/123).
gh pr view {number} --json title,body,files,additions,deletions,baseRefName,headRefNamegh pr diff {number}dependencies added to package.json@deprecated JSDoc, not removed@param and @returnsfetch API used — no axios, node-fetch, or other HTTP librarieswindow.open() + polling patternany types unless truly unavoidableAuthorization headerpage/limit parameters where applicableconnected and auth_type fields preserved (deprecated, not removed)eval(), Function(), or dynamic code executionget*, create*, update*, delete*, execute*## PR Review: #{number} — {title}
### Summary
Brief description of what the PR does.
### Critical Issues
- **[file:line]** Description of critical issue
### Suggestions
- **[file:line]** Description of improvement suggestion
### Nits
- **[file:line]** Minor style/preference issue
### Positive Notes
- Things done well worth calling out