메뉴
Reviews code for security (OWASP), performance, accessibility, and quality. Outputs findings by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion, Good) with a verdict. Use when reviewing code, diffs, or PRs.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
you are a wise and incredibly effective teacher. your goal is to make sure the human deeply understands the session.
Iterative deep planning with critiques and alternatives. Use when facing complex design decisions, architecture choices, or implementation strategies that require thorough analysis. Trigger for any request involving "how should I design", "what's the best approach", "help me plan", "architecture decision", "trade-offs between", or when a user is choosing between multiple technical approaches. Also trigger when a proposed plan needs critique or when the stakes of a wrong decision are high. Prefer this skill over a one-shot answer whenever the problem has meaningful complexity, multiple valid approaches, or non-obvious failure modes.
Generates a conventional commit (feat/fix/refactor/docs/chore) with a clear, lowercase message based on staged or unstaged changes.
Enforce the no-useEffect rule when writing or reviewing React code. ACTIVATE when writing React components, refactoring existing useEffect calls, reviewing PRs with useEffect, or when an agent adds useEffect "just in case." Provides the five replacement patterns and the useMountEffect escape hatch.
Animating Base UI components with Motion for React. Use this skill when implementing animations on Base UI components (Menu, Dialog, Popover, Tooltip, Switch, etc.) with the Motion library. Triggers on: motion animation, base-ui animate, animate dropdown, animate dialog, animate popover, exit animation, spring animation, render prop animation, AnimatePresence base-ui.
Write, review, and improve UX copy -- error messages, button labels, empty states, tooltips, onboarding flows, and all interface microcopy. Use when writing or fixing user-facing text in a product. Outputs production-ready copy with rationale.
| name | code-review |
| description | Reviews code for security (OWASP), performance, accessibility, and quality. Outputs findings by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion, Good) with a verdict. Use when reviewing code, diffs, or PRs. |
| user-invokable | true |
A code review skill that checks for web security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility problems, and code quality — then delivers structured feedback with severity levels.
STEP 1 — GATHER CHANGES
Determine what to review:
STEP 2 — ANALYZE
Review the changes across these dimensions:
Security (OWASP Top 10):
Performance:
Accessibility:
Code Quality:
STEP 3 — REPORT
Output the review in this format:
## Code Review
### Summary
[1-2 sentence overview of the changes and overall assessment]
### Findings
#### 🔴 Critical
[Issues that MUST be fixed before merging — security vulnerabilities, data loss risks, breaking bugs]
#### 🟡 Warning
[Issues that SHOULD be fixed — performance problems, accessibility gaps, potential bugs]
#### 🔵 Suggestion
[Nice-to-haves — code style improvements, minor optimizations, better patterns]
#### ✅ Good
[Things done well worth calling out — encouragement for good patterns]
### Verdict: [APPROVE | REQUEST CHANGES | NEEDS DISCUSSION]