bio-genome-annotation-annotation-transfer

name	bio-genome-annotation-annotation-transfer
description	Transfers gene annotations between genome assemblies via coordinate liftover (UCSC liftOver, CrossMap for same-species version updates) or feature/sequence projection (Liftoff for same/close species, miniprot for protein-level cross-species, TOGA/GeMoMa/CAT for distant clades). Covers the coordinate-vs-projection decision by divergence, why a successful lift is not biological confirmation, reference bias, the silent-dropping of unmapped features, build/PAR/MHC/inversion hazards, and transfer-vs-de-novo validation. Use when annotating a new assembly of a species with an existing reference, harmonizing coordinates across builds, or mapping annotations across related species.
tool_type	cli
primary_tool	Liftoff

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: Liftoff 1.6.3+, LiftoffTools 0.4+, miniprot 0.13+, CrossMap 0.7+, UCSC liftOver (current), BioPython 1.83+, gffutils 0.12+.

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

• CLI: <tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags
• Python: pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures

The chain file must match the exact assembly pair (build and patch); the source and target build must be recorded with every coordinate (a coordinate without a build is unusable). If code throws an error, introspect the installed tool and adapt rather than retrying.

Annotation Transfer

"Transfer annotations from a reference to my new assembly" -> Map gene models from a well-annotated reference onto a target, by coordinate liftover (same-species, fast) or by re-aligning the actual gene sequence (cross-assembly/species, structure-aware), then validate against the target.

• CLI: liftoff -g ref.gff3 -o out.gff3 -u unmapped.txt target.fa reference.fa (note: target before reference), liftOver in.bed map.chain out.bed unmapped (intervals)

The Single Most Important Modern Insight -- A Lift Is Geometry, Not Biology

Coordinate liftover and feature projection answer different questions, and choosing the wrong one is the dominant failure mode:

• Coordinate liftover (liftOver/CrossMap, on pre-computed chains) answers "where does this interval sit in the other assembly's coordinate system?" It moves numbers; it never re-examines the sequence.
• Feature projection (Liftoff/miniprot/TOGA) answers "where is this gene, with its exon-intron structure intact, and is it still a functional gene?" It re-aligns the biological sequence.

Three load-bearing consequences:

1. A successful lift is not biological confirmation. liftOver can place a gene at perfectly valid target coordinates that land in a pseudogenized, frameshifted, or collapsed-duplication region - the coordinate is right and the gene is dead, and the tool has no vocabulary to flag it. The output GFF inherits the reference's gene/CDS feature types verbatim. The "it mapped, ship it" culture is how a lifted GFF acquires the social status of a validated annotation while no one ever re-derived a model from sequence. Treat every lifted annotation as a hypothesis until target evidence (intact ORF, identity distribution, BUSCO, RNA-seq) has touched it.
2. Transfer is reference-biased: it can only reproduce what the reference annotated. Lineage-specific genes, target-specific expansions, novel isoforms, and orphan genes are structurally invisible - the new assembly's actual novelty (the reason it is interesting) is exactly what transfer cannot see. Always pair transfer with de novo + evidence; TOGA can call gene loss but is constitutionally incapable of calling gene gain.
3. Read and classify the unmapped file - it is the most information-rich output. liftOver writes failures to a side file, exits 0, and prints a clean shorter GFF with no visual tell; entire gene families can vanish silently. "Deleted in new" vs "Split in new" vs "Duplicated in new" are biologically distinct diagnoses (chain gap / rearrangement breakpoint / segmental duplication or gene family).

Two Paradigms

Paradigm	Tools	Operates on	Right for
A. Coordinate liftover	UCSC liftOver, CrossMap, segment_liftover, paftools	pre-computed chains; intervals (BED/GFF/VCF/BAM)	same-species version updates (hg19<->hg38, mm10<->mm39); variant/peak/CNV harmonization
B. Feature/sequence projection	Liftoff (nt), miniprot (protein), GeMoMa, TOGA, CAT, LiftOn	re-aligned gene sequence	cross-assembly/species; full gene models; polyploid/duplicated; no reliable chain

Decision Tree by Divergence

Divergence	Recommended	Why
Same species, transfer intervals	liftOver / CrossMap	chain is dense; geometry suffices for variants/peaks
Same species, transfer gene models	Liftoff (-chroms)	structure-aware; per-interval liftOver fragments transcripts
Same genus (a few % divergence)	Liftoff + miniprot rescue for the divergent tail	nucleotide alignment robust; protein for the rest
Same family/order (tens-hundreds My)	TOGA or GeMoMa (multi-reference)	nucleotide saturates; orthology + gene-loss reasoning
Beyond family / lineage-specific content / heavy rearrangement	-> eukaryotic-gene-prediction (de novo) + transfer as evidence	reference too far; only de novo sees target-specific biology
Pan-genome / multi-haplotype	vg annotate onto the graph	avoids single-reference bias (tooling still maturing)

Cross-species coordinate liftover is a methodological error (synteny fragments into thousands of short chains; most genes drop silently) - it is the wrong paradigm, not a tuning problem.

Liftoff (Same / Close Species, Nucleotide)

liftoff -g reference.gff3 -o lifted.gff3 -u unmapped.txt -p 16 \
    -chroms chrom_map.txt -polish target.fasta reference.fasta

Positional args are target first, then reference (commonly swapped - a silent error). Liftoff extracts each gene's exon sequence, aligns with minimap2, and chooses the placement maximizing identity while preserving exon-intron structure. Key flags: -a (alignment coverage, default 0.5), -s (sequence identity, default 0.5), -copies/-sc (search for extra gene copies - a per-family decision, not a default), -polish (re-align to restore intact start/stop/splice, writes *_polished.gff3), -exclude_partial, -chroms (ordered chromosome mapping; reduces false cross-chromosome placements). LiftoffTools QCs the result (variants, synteny, copy-number changes). Same-species version updates should lift ≥99% - a 97% rate is a four-alarm signal of the wrong chain or coordinate-convention mismatch, not "pretty good."

miniprot (Cross-Species, Protein)

miniprot -t 16 -d target.mpi target.fasta            # optional index
miniprot -Iut 16 --gff target.mpi proteins.faa > out.gff

Protein conserves far deeper than nucleotide (synonymous sites saturate), so miniprot works across species where Liftoff's nucleotide alignment fails. -I auto-sets max intron from genome length; --gff emits GFF3. Frameshift and in-frame-stop tags in the output are the signal that the "gene" is pseudogenized in the target, not a clean ortholog - inspect them; do not treat a miniprot hit as a functional gene by default. For a polished multi-reference, intron-aware annotation use GeMoMa (which reasons about intron-position conservation); for the DNA+protein hybrid use LiftOn.

TOGA (Distant Species, Orthology + Gene Loss)

TOGA consumes a genome-alignment chain + reference BED12 and uses ML on chain features (including intronic/intergenic flanks - orthologs share flanking context, paralogs/retrocopies do not) to classify orthology (one2one ... one2zero) and gene-loss/intactness (intact / partially intact / lost / missing). It exists precisely because across deep time an inactivated gene still aligns - a coordinate lift reports the corpse as "present." Use TOGA for whole-clade ortholog projection; it does not discover target-specific novel genes (the reference-bias caveat of all of Paradigm B).

Validating a Transfer with Python

Goal: Quantify transfer quality and, critically, check that lifted CDS are biologically intact, not just placed.

Approach: Compare gene counts for a transfer rate, then translate each lifted CDS from the target and check for a valid start, a single terminal stop, and correct length - coordinate success is not intactness.

import gffutils
from Bio import SeqIO

def orf_integrity(lifted_gff, target_fasta):
    genome = SeqIO.to_dict(SeqIO.parse(target_fasta, 'fasta'))
    db = gffutils.create_db(lifted_gff, ':memory:', merge_strategy='merge')
    valid = total = 0
    for cds in db.features_of_type('CDS'):
        total += 1
        seq = genome[cds.seqid].seq[cds.start - 1:cds.end]
        if cds.strand == '-':
            seq = seq.reverse_complement()
        prot = seq.translate()
        if prot.startswith('M') and prot.endswith('*') and prot.count('*') == 1:
            valid += 1
    print(f'Intact ORFs: {valid}/{total} ({valid/total:.1%}) -- a clean lift can still land in a pseudogene')
    return valid, total

Also: read and classify the unmapped file (not just count it); run BUSCO on the lifted protein set and compare to the reference (a drop quantifies silently lost conserved genes); compare to a de novo annotation to expose reference bias.

Hazards and the 1% That Matters

• The 1% that does not lift trivially is enriched for the interesting parts. ~99% of the human genome lifts hg19<->hg38 (liftOver ~99.99% over ~1.57M ClinVar variants), but failures concentrate in indels/large duplications (a pathogenic 8.1 kb LDLR duplication failed all three tools), PAR (double-maps), MHC, segmental duplications, centromeres/telomeres, and regions inverted between GRCh37/GRCh38 where coordinate conversion silently corrupts palindromic SNVs and imputation (the chr10 MSMB/rs10993994 prostate-cancer signal dropped p=2.86e-7 to 0.0011 across ~20,000 individuals; Sheng 2022). A lift touching any of these is suspect until validated.
• Coordinate conventions and build identity bite. BED is 0-based half-open; GFF/GTF/VCF are 1-based closed - a conversion at a format boundary shifts every start by 1 (passes smell tests, corrupts splice/start bases). VCF lifts must update the REF allele (CrossMap does; naive shifting does not). hg19 chrM (NC_001807) is not rCRS (NC_012920) - two files both labeled "hg19" can have incompatible mitochondrial coordinates.
• Accumulation without revalidation. Annotations get lifted v1->v2->v3 forever; a model wrong in 2009 stays byte-for-byte wrong in 2024 because lifting copies models without re-examining them. Re-run de novo + evidence at major assembly upgrades and reconcile.

Per-Method Failure Modes

Cross-species coordinate liftover

Trigger: liftOver/CrossMap to transfer genes between species. Mechanism: synteny fragments into short chains; most genes have no co-linear counterpart. Symptom: plausible-looking output that silently dropped most genes. Fix: miniprot/TOGA/GeMoMa (sequence/orthology), not chains.

Not reading the unmapped file

Trigger: reporting a transfer complete from the success file alone. Mechanism: failures go to a side file; exit code 0. Symptom: a clean GFF missing entire gene families. Fix: read and classify unmapped (deletion/split/duplicated).

Coordinate success treated as intactness

Trigger: trusting a lifted gene because it placed. Mechanism: the locus can be pseudogenized/frameshifted. Symptom: RNA-seq quantified against a gene with an internal stop at residue 40. Fix: -polish + ORF check; miniprot frameshift tags; TOGA intactness class.

Swapped Liftoff positional args

Trigger: liftoff ... reference.fa target.fa. Mechanism: Liftoff is target reference. Symptom: nonsense mapping. Fix: target first, reference last.

Loosening -a/-s to "rescue" features

Trigger: lowering coverage/identity to clear the unmapped pile. Mechanism: a 35%-coverage hit is usually a paralog/pseudogene/repeat match. Symptom: low-confidence placements laundered into the success file. Fix: treat default-threshold failures as signal; loosen only with a biological hypothesis and validate rescues individually.

Quantitative Thresholds

Threshold	Source	Rationale
Same-species mapping rate ≥99%	Liftoff/ClinVar studies	a 97% rate signals wrong chain / convention mismatch
Liftoff -a/-s default 0.5	Liftoff	loosening manufactures false placements; failure is often signal
liftOver -minMatch default 0.95 (per-feature)	UCSC	a long feature with one chain gap fails silently
BUSCO on lifted set vs reference	completeness audit	a drop quantifies silently lost conserved genes
Divergence rule: species->liftOver/Liftoff; genus->+miniprot; family->TOGA/GeMoMa; beyond->de novo	lab convention	matches paradigm to where the chain/identity breaks
Every coordinate carries its build	reproducibility	a coordinate without a build is unusable

Common Errors

Error / symptom	Cause	Solution
Many unmapped features (same species)	wrong/patch-mismatched chain; contig naming (chr1 vs 1)	use the exact-pair chain; harmonize names
Mass gene loss, clean GFF	silent dropping	read/classify the unmapped file
Lifted genes with internal stops	landed in pseudogene/frameshift	-polish; ORF check; re-predict de novo in problem loci
Paralog/copy collapse or swap	no -copies, or mapped to the paralog	-copies/-sc per family; TOGA orthology graph
Most genes lost cross-species	coordinate liftover used across species	switch to miniprot/TOGA
mtDNA coordinates don't match	hg19 chrM != rCRS	record the exact MT record, not just "hg19"

References

• Shumate A, Salzberg SL. 2021. Liftoff: accurate mapping of gene annotations. Bioinformatics 37:1639-1643.
• Shumate A, Salzberg SL. 2024. LiftoffTools: a toolkit for comparing gene annotations mapped between genome assemblies. F1000Research 11:1230.
• Li H. 2023. Protein-to-genome alignment with miniprot. Bioinformatics 39:btad014.
• Zhao H, et al. 2014. CrossMap: a versatile tool for coordinate conversion between genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 30:1006-1007.
• Hinrichs AS, et al. 2006. The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D590-D598.
• Kent WJ, et al. 2003. Evolution's cauldron: duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes (chains and nets). PNAS 100:11484-11489.
• Keilwagen J, et al. 2016. Using intron position conservation for homology-based gene prediction (GeMoMa). Nucleic Acids Res 44:e89.
• Otto TD, et al. 2011. RATT: Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e57.
• Kirilenko BM, et al. 2023. Integrating gene annotation with orthology inference at scale (TOGA). Science 380:eabn3107.
• Fiddes IT, et al. 2018. Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT): simultaneous clade and personal genome annotation. Genome Res 28:1029-1038.
• Chao KH, et al. 2025. Combining DNA and protein alignments to improve genome annotation with LiftOn. Genome Res 35:311-325.
• Sheng X, Xia L, Cahoon JL, Conti DV, Haiman CA, Kachuri L, Chiang CWK. 2022. Inverted genomic regions between reference genome builds in humans impact imputation accuracy and decrease the power of association testing. HGG Adv 4:100159.

Related Skills

• eukaryotic-gene-prediction - De novo annotation; the complement that captures target-specific genes
• annotation-qc - BUSCO on the lifted set and gene-structure integrity checks
• comparative-genomics/ortholog-inference - Orthology relationships across species
• comparative-genomics/synteny-analysis - Synteny context that validates or refutes a transfer
• genome-intervals/gtf-gff-handling - Parse and manipulate transferred annotations