메뉴
Assume the plan failed — then explain why. Three pessimists write failure narratives, two optimists rebut, a risk assessor weighs which failure modes are real.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Generate a wide field of ideas, then pressure-test them. Five generators diverge, two challengers prune the weak ones, three synthesizers rank what survives.
Three-agent adversarial bug finder. Hunter overclaims every issue it can find, Skeptic disproves what it can, Referee arbitrates what survives. Scoring incentives force each role to behave honestly.
Dialectic process for reviewing, brainstorming, comparing tradeoffs, or stress-testing plans. Configurable modes, agent counts, and expert lenses.
Execute a pre-defined plan using implementation agents (no design changes)
Capture structured learnings (gotcha, pattern, decision, bug-fix) as JSONL per project. Cross-project searchable.
Adversarial stress-test of code, a plan, or an argument. Three critics attack, one defender rebuts, a referee judges, then a hostile auditor attacks the synthesis itself.
| name | premortem |
| description | Assume the plan failed — then explain why. Three pessimists write failure narratives, two optimists rebut, a risk assessor weighs which failure modes are real. |
Run /dialectic-review --premortem $ARGUMENTS
Read ~/.claude/skills/dialectic-review/SKILL.md for argument parsing, then read ~/.claude/skills/dialectic-review/premortem-prompts.md for the phase prompts. Follow the full three-phase process defined there. Any /dialectic-review flag is valid here — it passes straight through.
