deployless-release-controls

name	deployless-release-controls
description	Runtime release controls for deployless repositories. Use when a repo needs feature flags, kill switches, capability gates, targeted rollout, remote config, routing rules, or a provider-neutral release-control facade independent of language and provider.
metadata	{"priority":6,"pathPatterns":["src/**","app/**","lib/**","config/**","docs/**"],"promptSignals":{"phrases":["feature flag","kill switch","release control","runtime flag","remote config","targeted rollout"],"allOf":[["deployment","release"],["flag","rollout"]],"anyOf":["LaunchDarkly","Unleash","Statsig","ConfigCat","capability gate"],"noneOf":[],"minScore":5}}

Runtime Release Controls for Any-Language Repositories

Purpose

Introduce runtime release controls so merging and deploying code does not automatically expose unfinished or risky behavior to users.

In a deployless workflow:

• deployment moves code into the runtime
• release exposes behavior
• release can be changed without a new deploy when practical
• risky behavior has a kill switch
• flags are observable, testable, owned, and eventually removed

Control types

Choose one or more based on the repo's architecture.

Control type	Use when
Feature flag	Product or behavior can be toggled per environment, user, cohort, tenant, request, or percentage
Kill switch	Behavior must be disabled quickly during incident response
Capability gate	Access depends on plan, permission, entitlement, tenant, role, or environment
Routing rule	Traffic must shift between implementations, versions, regions, or backends
Remote config	Parameters should change without redeploying code
Build-time guard	Runtime control is impossible; acceptable only with documented limitation

Prefer runtime controls over build-time guards when the platform allows it.

Inputs to inspect

• Existing flag or config providers
• Authentication and user/tenant context
• Request context or execution context type
• Dependency injection or service locator conventions
• Logging and tracing conventions
• Test framework
• Configuration loading
• Environment-variable usage
• Mobile or frontend remote-config system, if applicable
• Worker, CLI, batch, or background-job context

Provider-neutral flag contract

Create a small release-control facade using the language's normal idioms.

The contract should support:

is_enabled(flag_key, context, default=false) -> boolean
get_variant(flag_key, context, default_variant) -> variant
get_value(config_key, context, default_value) -> typed value

Where context can include:

environment
service_name
service_version
request_id
trace_id
actor_id or anonymous stable key
tenant_id
role or plan
region
route or operation name

Do not include raw personally sensitive data in flag context. Prefer stable opaque IDs or hashed keys when needed.

Recommended file layout

Use the repo's conventions, but these paths are good defaults:

src/release-controls/
  client.*
  context.*
  provider.*
  local-provider.*
  test-provider.*
  README.md
config/
  flags.example.*
docs/
  release-controls.md
  flag-lifecycle.md

For languages without a src convention, place the module beside existing application infrastructure code.

Language adaptation examples

Use native idioms:

• JavaScript/TypeScript: exported module, interface, dependency injection, middleware context
• Python: protocol/abstract base class, module-level provider, FastAPI/Flask/Django integration
• Go: interface plus context-aware client, context.Context integration
• Rust: trait plus typed context struct, feature-gated provider only if needed
• Java/Kotlin: interface plus DI bean/service, servlet/filter or framework interceptor context
• .NET: interface plus dependency injection service, middleware context
• Ruby: module/service object with request context
• PHP: service class registered in framework container
• Elixir: behaviour plus application config and plug context
• C/C++: abstraction header and provider implementation; keep runtime config reload explicit
• Mobile: remote config or backend-delivered flags with local cache and safe defaults

Implementation procedure

1. Reuse existing provider when present

If the repo already uses a provider, standardize access behind a facade rather than adding another provider.

Examples of existing providers:

• LaunchDarkly
• Unleash
• Statsig
• ConfigCat
• Flagsmith
• Split
• Flipt
• cloud platform remote config
• in-house entitlement or config service

2. Add a local provider if no provider exists

A local provider is acceptable as a first step. It should:

• read from environment variables, local config, or a checked-in example file
• default to safe values
• avoid secrets
• be easy to replace with a managed provider
• support tests deterministically

Do not add production credentials or vendor tokens.

3. Define flag metadata

Every flag should have metadata in docs or config:

key
purpose
owner
created date
expected removal date
safe default
rollout plan
kill-switch behavior
metrics or logs to watch
cleanup issue or task

4. Add test provider

Add a deterministic test provider so tests can set flags explicitly.

Tests should cover:

• default-off behavior
• enabled behavior
• missing flag behavior
• variant behavior, if variants are supported
• kill-switch behavior
• context-sensitive behavior, if used

5. Wrap risky behavior at stable boundaries

Prefer flag checks at boundaries:

• route handler
• controller/action
• command handler
• use-case/service boundary
• frontend page or component boundary
• background job entrypoint
• external integration adapter
• infrastructure rollout module

Avoid scattering flag checks deep inside unrelated business logic unless the flag is truly local to that logic.

6. Add observability

Log or trace release-control decisions in a low-cardinality way:

flag_key
flag_enabled
variant
provider
default_used
request_id
trace_id
service_version

Do not log sensitive user data.

7. Add lifecycle docs

Create or update docs/flag-lifecycle.md:

# Release-control lifecycle

1. Create the flag with an owner and safe default.
2. Merge dormant code to main behind the flag.
3. Deploy automatically from main.
4. Enable for internal/test cohort.
5. Ramp gradually while watching metrics and traces.
6. Commit the change by setting the flag to default-on or 100%.
7. Remove stale flag branches and dead code.
8. Delete provider-side flag config.

Naming rules

Use stable names:

area.capability.behavior
checkout.payment.new_processor
search.ranking.v2
billing.invoice_pdf_renderer
worker.email_digest.v2

Avoid names tied to temporary ticket IDs only. Ticket IDs can appear in metadata.

Defaults and failure behavior

• New user-facing behavior should usually default off.
• Safety fixes may default on with a kill switch.
• Missing provider should fail closed for risky behavior.
• Missing provider may fail open only for clearly safe maintenance behavior.
• Provider outages must be handled explicitly.
• Mobile clients should cache safe defaults and tolerate stale config.

Release-control cleanup

A flag is stale when:

• rollout is permanently 100%
• old behavior no longer needs rollback
• associated migration is complete
• dependent clients have aged out
• compliance signoff is complete, if required

When stale:

1. Remove dead branches.
2. Remove tests for obsolete behavior unless needed for compatibility.
3. Keep regression tests for the final behavior.
4. Remove provider config.
5. Update docs.

Output

Create or update:

• release-control facade/module using the repo's language and conventions
• local provider and deterministic test provider
• example config without secrets
• tests for default and enabled behavior
• docs/release-controls.md
• docs/flag-lifecycle.md
• docs/deployless-mainline-plan.md, appending release-control details

Acceptance criteria

This skill is complete when:

• feature exposure can be changed independently from deployment for at least one representative path
• code uses a central release-control facade rather than scattered ad hoc environment checks
• safe defaults are defined
• tests can force enabled and disabled states
• flag decisions are observable
• lifecycle and cleanup rules are documented
• no provider secret is committed

Anti-goals

• Do not replace all authorization or entitlement checks with feature flags.
• Do not put sensitive data in flag context.
• Do not add a paid/vendor dependency when a facade and local provider are enough for the first step.
• Do not use flags as a permanent substitute for deleting obsolete code.
• Do not use build-time flags as the primary release mechanism when runtime control is available.