원클릭으로
service-check
Use to evaluate a service or feature against Downe's 15 principles of good services.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use to evaluate a service or feature against Downe's 15 principles of good services.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Accessibility audit against WCAG 2.1 AA. Checks semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, screen reader compatibility.
Design the smallest viable test to validate or invalidate a critical assumption. Based on Torres's assumption testing framework.
Use before any research activity or significant decision. Reviews cognitive biases relevant to the current stage.
Use to evaluate whether current work aligns with Better Value Sooner Safer Happier. Run at diamond completion and periodically.
Synchronize canvas state across team sessions via git. Ensures all team members see the same product knowledge.
Update canvas sections with new evidence. Ensures canvas stays current as the single source of truth.
| name | service-check |
| description | Use to evaluate a service or feature against Downe's 15 principles of good services. |
Evaluate against Lou Downe's 15 principles.
For each principle, assess: Pass / Partial / Fail / N/A
Easy to find: Can users find this service without knowing its name?
Clearly explains its purpose: Is it immediately clear what this does?
Sets expectations: Do users know what will happen?
Enables completion: Can users finish what they came to do?
Familiar: Does it work the way users expect?
No prior knowledge needed: Can a new user succeed?
Agnostic of org structures: Are internal boundaries invisible?
Minimum steps: Is every step necessary?
Consistent: Is language/design uniform throughout?
No dead ends: Is there always a next step?
Usable by everyone: Is it accessible and inclusive?
Encourages right behaviors: Does design nudge good outcomes?
Responds to change: Can it adapt?
Explains decisions: Are automated decisions transparent?
Easy to get human help: Can users reach a person?
## Service Check: [Service Name]
| # | Principle | Status | Notes |
|---|-----------|--------|-------|
| 1 | Easy to find | Pass/Partial/Fail | ... |
...
| 15 | Human help | Pass/Partial/Fail | ... |
Score: [X/15 Pass, Y/15 Partial, Z/15 Fail]
Priority fixes: [top 3 items to address]