원클릭으로
game-development
Game development orchestrator. Routes to platform-specific skills based on project needs.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Game development orchestrator. Routes to platform-specific skills based on project needs.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Senior agent organizer with expertise in assembling and coordinating multi-agent teams. Your focus spans task analysis, agent capability mapping, workflow design, and team optimization.
AI agent design principles. Agent loops, tool calling, memory architectures, multi-agent coordination, human-in-the-loop gates, and guardrails. Use when building AI agents, autonomous workflows, or any system where an LLM plans and executes multi-step tasks.
API design principles and decision-making. REST vs GraphQL vs tRPC selection, response formats, versioning, pagination.
Main application building orchestrator. Creates full-stack applications from natural language requests. Determines project type, selects tech stack, coordinates agents.
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.
| name | game-development |
| description | Game development orchestrator. Routes to platform-specific skills based on project needs. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| last-updated | "2026-03-12T00:00:00.000Z" |
| applies-to-model | gemini-2.5-pro, claude-3-7-sonnet |
Orchestrator skill that provides core principles and routes to specialized sub-skills.
You are working on a game development project. This skill teaches the PRINCIPLES of game development and directs you to the right sub-skill based on context.
| If the game targets... | Use Sub-Skill |
|---|---|
| Web browsers (HTML5, WebGL) | game-development/web-games |
| Mobile (iOS, Android) | game-development/mobile-games |
| PC (Steam, Desktop) | game-development/pc-games |
| VR/AR headsets | game-development/vr-ar |
| If the game is... | Use Sub-Skill |
|---|---|
| 2D (sprites, tilemaps) | game-development/2d-games |
| 3D (meshes, shaders) | game-development/3d-games |
| If you need... | Use Sub-Skill |
|---|---|
| GDD, balancing, player psychology | game-development/game-design |
| Multiplayer, networking | game-development/multiplayer |
| Visual style, asset pipeline, animation | game-development/game-art |
| Sound design, music, adaptive audio | game-development/game-audio |
Every game, regardless of platform, follows this pattern:
INPUT → Read player actions
UPDATE → Process game logic (fixed timestep)
RENDER → Draw the frame (interpolated)
Fixed Timestep Rule:
| Pattern | Use When | Example |
|---|---|---|
| State Machine | 3-5 discrete states | Player: Idle→Walk→Jump |
| Object Pooling | Frequent spawn/destroy | Bullets, particles |
| Observer/Events | Cross-system communication | Health→UI updates |
| ECS | Thousands of similar entities | RTS units, particles |
| Command | Undo, replay, networking | Input recording |
| Behavior Tree | Complex AI decisions | Enemy AI |
Decision Rule: Start with State Machine. Add ECS only when performance demands.
Abstract input into ACTIONS, not raw keys:
"jump" → Space, Gamepad A, Touch tap
"move" → WASD, Left stick, Virtual joystick
Why: Enables multi-platform, rebindable controls.
| System | Budget |
|---|---|
| Input | 1ms |
| Physics | 3ms |
| AI | 2ms |
| Game Logic | 4ms |
| Rendering | 5ms |
| Buffer | 1.67ms |
Optimization Priority:
| AI Type | Complexity | Use When |
|---|---|---|
| FSM | Simple | 3-5 states, predictable behavior |
| Behavior Tree | Medium | Modular, designer-friendly |
| GOAP | High | Emergent, planning-based |
| Utility AI | High | Scoring-based decisions |
| Type | Best For |
|---|---|
| AABB | Rectangles, fast checks |
| Circle | Round objects, cheap |
| Spatial Hash | Many similar-sized objects |
| Quadtree | Large worlds, varying sizes |
| Don't | Do |
|---|---|
| Update everything every frame | Use events, dirty flags |
| Create objects in hot loops | Object pooling |
| Cache nothing | Cache references |
| Optimize without profiling | Profile first |
| Mix input with logic | Abstract input layer |
→ Start with game-development/web-games for framework selection
→ Then game-development/2d-games for sprite/tilemap patterns
→ Reference game-development/game-design for level design
→ Start with game-development/mobile-games for touch input and stores
→ Use game-development/game-design for puzzle balancing
→ game-development/vr-ar for comfort and immersion
→ game-development/3d-games for rendering
→ game-development/multiplayer for networking
Remember: Great games come from iteration, not perfection. Prototype fast, then polish.
When this skill produces or reviews code, structure your output as follows:
━━━ Game Development Report ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Skill: Game Development
Language: [detected language / framework]
Scope: [N files · N functions]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
✅ Passed: [checks that passed, or "All clean"]
⚠️ Warnings: [non-blocking issues, or "None"]
❌ Blocked: [blocking issues requiring fix, or "None"]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
VBC status: PENDING → VERIFIED
Evidence: [test output / lint pass / compile success]
VBC (Verification-Before-Completion) is mandatory. Do not mark status as VERIFIED until concrete terminal evidence is provided.
AI coding assistants often fall into specific bad habits when dealing with this domain. These are strictly forbidden:
// VERIFY or check package.json / requirements.txt.Slash command: /review or /tribunal-full
Active reviewers: logic-reviewer · security-auditor
// VERIFY: [reason].Review these questions before confirming output:
✅ Did I rely ONLY on real, verified tools and methods?
✅ Is this solution appropriately scoped to the user's constraints?
✅ Did I handle potential failure modes and edge cases?
✅ Have I avoided generic boilerplate that doesn't add value?
CRITICAL: You must follow a strict "evidence-based closeout" state machine.