| name | query |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| description | Answer questions using the brain's knowledge with 3-layer search, synthesis,
and citation propagation. Use when the user asks a question, wants a lookup,
or needs information from the brain.
|
| triggers | ["what do we know about","tell me about","who is","what happened","search for","look up","background on","notes on","who knows who","relationship between","connections","graph query"] |
| tools | ["search","query","get_page","list_pages","get_backlinks","traverse_graph","get_timeline"] |
| mutating | false |
Query Skill
Answer questions using the brain's knowledge with 3-layer search and synthesis.
Contract
This skill guarantees:
- Every answer is grounded in brain content (no hallucination)
- Every claim has a citation tracing back to a specific page slug
- Gaps are flagged explicitly ("the brain doesn't have information on X")
- Source precedence is respected (user statements > compiled truth > timeline > external)
- Conflicting sources are noted with both citations
Phases
- Decompose the question into search strategies:
- Keyword search for specific names, dates, terms
- Semantic query for conceptual questions
- Structured queries (list by type, backlinks) for relational questions
- Execute searches:
- Keyword search inbrain for FTS matches (search)
- Hybrid search inbrain for semantic+keyword with expansion (query)
- List pages in inbrain by type or check backlinks for structural queries
- Read top results. Read the top 3-5 pages from inbrain to get full context.
- Synthesize answer with citations. Every claim traces back to a specific page slug.
- Flag gaps. If the brain doesn't have info, say "the brain doesn't have information on X" rather than hallucinating.
Anti-Patterns
- Answering from general knowledge when the brain has relevant content
- Hallucinating facts not in the brain
- Silently picking one source when sources conflict
- Loading full pages when search chunks are sufficient
- Ignoring source precedence (user statements are highest authority)
Output Format
Answers should include:
- Direct response to the question
- Citations: "According to [Source: people/jane-doe, compiled truth]..."
- Gap flags: "The brain doesn't have information on X"
- Conflict notes when sources disagree
Quality Rules
- Never hallucinate. Only answer from brain content.
- Cite sources: "According to concepts/do-things-that-dont-scale..."
- Flag stale results: if a search result shows [STALE], note that the info may be outdated
- For "who" questions, use backlinks and typed links to find connections
- For "what happened" questions, use timeline entries
- For "what do we know" questions, read compiled_truth directly
Token-Budget Awareness
Search returns chunks, not full pages. Read the excerpts first before deciding
whether to load a full page.
inbrain search / inbrain query return ranked chunks with context snippets.
These are often enough to answer the question directly.
- Only use
inbrain get <slug> to load the full page when a chunk confirms the
page is relevant and you need more context (e.g., compiled truth, timeline).
- "Tell me about X" -- get the full page (the user wants the complete picture).
- "Did anyone mention Y?" -- search results are enough (the user wants a yes/no with evidence).
Source precedence
When multiple sources provide conflicting information, follow this precedence:
- User's direct statements (highest authority -- what the user told you directly)
- Compiled truth (the brain's synthesized, cited understanding)
- Timeline entries (raw evidence, reverse-chronological)
- External sources (web search, API enrichment -- lowest authority)
When sources conflict, note the contradiction with both citations. Don't silently
pick one.
Citation in Answers
When referencing brain pages in your answer, propagate inline citations:
- Cite the page: "According to [Source: people/jane-doe, compiled truth]..."
- When brain pages have inline
[Source: ...] citations, propagate them so
the user can trace facts to their origin
- When you synthesize across multiple pages, cite all sources
Graph Traversal (v0.10.1+)
For relationship questions ("who knows who at X?", "connections between A and B",
"who works at Acme?", "who attended the standup?"), use the graph layer instead
of full-text search:
inbrain graph-query <slug> --type <link_type> --depth N --direction in|out|both
- Available link types:
attended, works_at, invested_in, founded, advises, mentions, source
--direction in answers "who points to X?" (e.g., who works at company X)
--direction out answers "what does X point to?" (default)
--depth N controls multi-hop traversal (default 5)
Examples:
- "Who works at Acme?" →
inbrain graph-query companies/acme --type works_at --direction in
- "Who attended Demo Day W26?" →
inbrain graph-query meetings/demo-day-w26 --type attended --direction out
- "What companies has Emily advised?" →
inbrain graph-query people/emily --type advises --direction out
- "Who has Alice met (via meetings)?" →
inbrain graph-query people/alice --type attended --depth 2
Combine with inbrain query for queries that need BOTH semantic similarity AND
graph structure. Search results are ranked with a small backlink boost so well-
connected entities surface higher.
Search Quality Awareness
If search results seem off (wrong results, missing known pages, irrelevant hits):
- Run
inbrain doctor --json to check index health
- Check embedding coverage -- partial embeddings degrade hybrid search
- Compare keyword search (
inbrain search) vs hybrid search (inbrain query)
for the same query to isolate whether the issue is embedding-related
- Report search quality issues in the maintain workflow (see maintain skill)
Tools Used
- Keyword search inbrain (search)
- Hybrid search inbrain (query)
- Read a page from inbrain (get_page)
- List pages in inbrain with filters (list_pages)
- Check backlinks in inbrain (get_backlinks)
- Traverse the link graph in inbrain (traverse_graph)
- View timeline entries in inbrain (get_timeline)