메뉴
Reviews API and infrastructure security configuration, including endpoints, headers, transport, and deployment settings. Use when auditing API or infrastructure hardening.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Conducts a comprehensive authentication security review covering login, sessions, tokens, and credential handling. Use when auditing authentication for vulnerabilities.
Analyzes authorization and access-control logic across routes and resources for privilege and enforcement flaws. Use when auditing authorization, RBAC, or access control.
Analyzes business logic for security flaws such as workflow bypasses, race conditions, and abuse cases. Use when reviewing application logic for exploitable behavior.
Detects duplicated and near-duplicate code across the codebase and suggests consolidation. Use when reviewing for copy-paste code, repeated logic, or DRY violations.
Analyzes code complexity and adherence to quality standards, flagging overly complex functions and metric outliers. Use when auditing maintainability, cyclomatic complexity, or coding-standard compliance.
Aggregates findings from the other security audits into one prioritized security report. Use after running individual security reviews to produce a consolidated report.
| name | api-and-infrastructure |
| description | Reviews API and infrastructure security configuration, including endpoints, headers, transport, and deployment settings. Use when auditing API or infrastructure hardening. |
| license | CC0-1.0 |
| metadata | {"category":"security"} |
| allowed-tools | Read Grep Glob Write |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
| argument-hint | [path or scope] |
Target: $ARGUMENTS
If no target path is given above, review the entire codebase.
Review API-specific security configurations.
Check for:
CORS configuration
Rate Limiting
API Versioning security
Request size limits
HTTP Security Headers
API key/token management
Error handling
A structured finding report with the following for each issue:
Title, Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), CWE (if applicable), Evidence (file, function, line ranges), and a short Why it matters.
Exploitability notes and, where safe, a minimal PoC or reproduction steps (no real secrets).
Remediation: precise code-level fix or config change (snippets welcome), plus defense-in-depth guidance.
A summary risk score (0–10) and top 3–5 prioritized fixes that reduce risk fastest.
A checklist diff: which items from the “Check for” list are Pass/Fail/Not Applicable.
Be concrete and cite exact code locations and identifiers.
Prefer minimal, drop-in fix snippets over prose.
Do not invent files or functions that aren’t present; if context is missing, mark as Unable to verify and say what code would prove it.
Write this into a markdown file and place it in the audits/ folder.
