원클릭으로
ce-product-pulse
生成产品脉搏报告:按时间窗口汇总用户体验、使用情况、质量、错误和待调查信号
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
生成产品脉搏报告:按时间窗口汇总用户体验、使用情况、质量、错误和待调查信号
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
| name | ce:product-pulse |
| description | 生成产品脉搏报告:按时间窗口汇总用户体验、使用情况、质量、错误和待调查信号 |
| argument-hint | [时间窗口,如 24h、7d、1h;默认 24h] |
| allowed-tools | ["Read","Write","Glob","Grep","Bash","AskUserQuestion"] |
ce-product-pulse queries the product's data sources for a given time window and produces a compact, single-page report covering usage, performance, errors, and followups. The report is saved to docs/pulse-reports/ and the key points are surfaced in chat.
The skill does not mutate the product, the database, or any external system. Its only writes are pulse settings appended to .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml (the unified CE local config, gitignored, machine-local) and the report file (docs/pulse-reports/...). MCP and other data-source tools are invoked read-only; if a tool offers write modes, do not use them.
Default to the platform's blocking question tool: AskUserQuestion in Claude Code (call ToolSearch with select:AskUserQuestion first if its schema isn't loaded), request_user_input in Codex, ask_user in Gemini, ask_user in Pi (requires the pi-ask-user extension). Fall back to numbered options in chat only when no blocking tool exists in the harness or the call errors (e.g., Codex edit modes) — not because a schema load is required. Never silently skip the question.
Ask one question at a time. Reserve multi-select for first-run configuration only.
#$ARGUMENTS
Interpret the argument as a time window. Common forms:
24h, 48h, 72h - trailing hours7d, 30d - trailing days1h - short-window (useful during launches)If the argument is empty, default to pulse_lookback_default from config (resolved in Phase 0); if that is also unset, fall through to the hard default of 24h. If the argument is unparseable, ask the user to clarify.
Apply a 15-minute trailing buffer to the window's upper bound. Many analytics and tracing tools have ingestion lag; querying right up to now under-reports the most recent events. For a 24h window, query [now - 24h - 15m, now - 15m].
docs/pulse-reports/ so past pulses are browseable as a timeline.STRATEGY.md exists, the interview reads it before asking questions and carries forward the product name and key metrics as seeds. The goal of data-source setup is to wire up whatever connections are needed to actually measure those metrics.Config (pre-resolved):
!(top=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null); [ -n "$top" ] && cat "$top/.compound-engineering/config.local.yaml" 2>/dev/null) || echo '__NO_CONFIG__'
If the block above contains YAML key-value pairs, extract values for the pulse_* keys listed under "Config keys" below.
If it shows __NO_CONFIG__, the file does not exist — treat this as a first run.
If it shows an unresolved command string, read .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml from the repo root using the native file-read tool (e.g., Read in Claude Code, read_file in Codex). If the file does not exist, treat as first run.
Config keys:
pulse_product_name -- string, used in report titles. Required for routing: if unset, skill is unconfigured.pulse_lookback_default -- one of 1h, 24h, 7d, 30d (default: 24h)pulse_primary_event -- string, the engagement event namepulse_value_event -- string, the value-realization event namepulse_completion_events -- comma-separated string of 0-3 event namespulse_quality_scoring -- true or default false (AI products only)pulse_quality_dimension -- string scored 1-5 when pulse_quality_scoring is true; ignored otherwisepulse_analytics_source -- string identifying analytics provider (e.g., posthog, mixpanel, custom)pulse_tracing_source -- string identifying tracing provider (e.g., sentry, datadog, custom)pulse_payments_source -- string identifying payments provider (e.g., stripe, custom); omit if not usedpulse_db_enabled -- true or default false; when true, read-only DB access is part of the pulsepulse_metric_sources -- comma-separated metric=source pairs giving per-strategy-metric source overrides (e.g., retention_d7=posthog,nps=delighted). Strategy metrics not listed fall back to pulse_analytics_source and are rendered with a (default source) marker so the implicit routing is visible.pulse_pending_metrics -- comma-separated string of strategy-doc metric names awaiting instrumentation; rendered as no data in each pulse report until instrumentation landspulse_excluded_metrics -- comma-separated string of strategy-doc metric names intentionally excluded from the pulse; the metric stays in STRATEGY.md but is not surfaced in pulse reportsRouting:
pulse_product_name is unset (or config file missing) -> First run. Go to Phase 1 (interview), then Phase 2.pulse_product_name is set -> Skip to Phase 2.If the argument was setup, reconfigure, or edit config, go to Phase 1 regardless of config state.
Before asking any questions, read STRATEGY.md using the native file-read tool. If the file exists, extract:
name key in the YAML frontmatter, falling back to the H1 title (stripping the trailing Strategy suffix, e.g., # Spiral Strategy -> Spiral) if frontmatter is missing## Key metrics section, one per lineOpen the interview by surfacing what was extracted: announce that a strategy doc was found, show the seeded product name and the list of key metrics that will be carried into event/data setup, and invite the user to correct any of it before continuing.
If STRATEGY.md does not exist, note that explicitly in chat: no strategy doc on file, running setup from scratch, and mention that ce-strategy can seed pulse later if run first.
Read references/interview.md. This load is non-optional - the pushback rules, anti-pattern examples, and metric-to-source mapping logic live there.
Run the interview in this order:
Apply the pushback rules in references/interview.md for each section. Treat every metric, event, and signal the user proposes against the SMART bar (specific, measurable, actionable, relevant, timely) spelled out in references/interview.md under "Overall Rules" - push back on anything vague, vanity, or unactionable.
If the user offers read-write database access, refuse and offer the alternatives documented in references/interview.md section 6.
Write the captured config to <repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.local.yaml as flat pulse_* keys, using the schema in references/interview.md under "Config file shape". Resolve the repo root with git rev-parse --show-toplevel. To write: (1) if the file or directory does not exist, create .compound-engineering/ and write the YAML file; (2) if the file exists, merge new keys into the existing YAML, preserving any non-pulse keys (e.g., work_delegate_*) untouched. If .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml is not already covered by the repo's .gitignore, offer to add the entry before writing. Show the resulting pulse block to the user in chat and offer one round of edits.
After the config is written, run the scheduling recommendation from references/interview.md section 9: offer to set up a recurring run so the user gets the pulse on a cadence instead of having to remember to run it. Accept yes/no/later. If yes, hand off to whichever scheduling primitive the current harness exposes — the in-plugin schedule skill if it is installed, otherwise note that scheduling is platform-specific (cron, GitHub Actions, the host's own automation) and emit a brief hint covering what would need to run. Do not schedule inline. Then proceed to Phase 2.
If Phase 1 ran (first run, or setup/reconfigure argument), re-read .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml from the repo root using the native file-read tool to pick up any edits accepted during the Phase 1 review step. Otherwise, use the pulse_* values already extracted in Phase 0. Apply hard defaults for any unset settings (see Phase 0 "Config keys").
Run these in parallel (different tools, no shared load):
Run these serially, after the parallel batch:
If pulse_quality_scoring is true (AI products only), sample up to 10 sessions or conversations from the window and score each 1-5 on the dimension recorded in pulse_quality_dimension.
Scoring discipline: Default to 4 or 5 when the session looks normal. Reserve 1-3 for sessions with a clear failure mode (product gave wrong answer, user got stuck, error surfaced). If every session is scoring 3, the bar is too strict; if every session is scoring 5, the bar is too loose.
No PII in the score summary. Capture a count distribution (e.g., "8x 5, 1x 4, 1x 2") and a short anonymized note on any session scored below 4. Do not include message content or user identifiers in the saved report.
Read references/report-template.md. Fill in the template using the query results. Four sections, in order:
Keep the total to 30-40 lines. If a section is thin, leave it thin; do not pad.
Save to docs/pulse-reports/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM.md using the local time of the run. Create docs/pulse-reports/ if it does not exist.
Surface the Headlines and top Followup in chat. Provide the full file path so the user can open the saved report.
First-run setup already offered scheduling (see Phase 1.1 end). Phase 3 is a lighter re-surface for ad-hoc runs:
daily, hourly, weekly), note that this run is ad-hoc and suggest scheduling via the harness's available primitive (the in-plugin schedule skill where present; otherwise a platform-native option) for recurring runs.Never schedule automatically. Any scheduling handoff requires explicit confirmation.
The "read like a founder" posture and the single-page constraint are deliberate. Dashboards with 40 metrics produce attention sprawl; one page with the right four sections forces the reader to notice what matters. The saved-reports folder is designed to be a team's working memory, not a data warehouse - past pulses are grepable, diffable, and disposable.
Fork Overlay:Task Bundle 持久化 + Failure FSM 集成。在 ce:work 基础上增加 state.md 读写和状态机转换。使用时机:执行 ce:work 时,如果任务有对应的 Task Bundle(docs/tasks/<id>/),加载此 skill 以启用持久化和状态追踪。
Fork Overlay:Codex-first 外部执行器策略。按任务特征路由到 Claude 或 Codex,Codex-first(非品牌路由)。使用时机:需要决定是否将当前任务派发给 Codex 时加载此 skill。
Fork Overlay:经验分层沉淀升级阶梯。检测是否值得将 solution 升级为 pattern 或 skill。使用时机:ce:compound 完成后手动调用,分析 docs/solutions/ 中的重复模式。(不会自动触发,需主动加载此 skill)
Fork Overlay:外部模型调用前置检查门控。调用 Codex/Gemini 之前运行五项检查,防止调用失败浪费时间。使用时机:任何调用外部模型(Codex [C]、Gemini [G])之前自动运行。
Fork Overlay:ce:work 意图分类门控。在执行前识别任务意图(实现/修复/重构/探索),设定对应的执行策略。使用时机:ce:work Phase 0(环境扫描)之后、Phase 1(Quick Start)之前。
Fork Overlay:Codex Patch Approval 咨询版。当 Codex 返回 patch 时,Claude 审批后才写入文件。使用时机:Codex 以 patch/diff 格式返回代码变更时,由 Claude 作为审批层。