소스 정보
- 저장소
- jleechanorg/claude-commands
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 5월 14일 05:02
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 3
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/jleechanorg/claude-commands --skill autor-bench-eloop명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Token-efficient second opinion slash command /advice. Extracts decision point + artifact (≤150 lines), then fans out in parallel: (1) Opus subagent reviewer with fallback chain codex→agy→cursor, (2) /research on the decision topic, (3) /secondo multi-model opinion. Use instead of advisor() which ships the full conversation uncached.
Use this skill when working in repositories managed by Agent Orchestrator or when the user asks how to use `ao` properly. Covers the default AO workflow: bootstrap with `ao start`, dispatch work with `ao spawn`, inspect progress with `ao status` or `ao session ls`, steer sessions with `ao send`, and recover or clean up sessions safely. Includes strict parameter fidelity, pre-spawn cap cleanup, quota-wall fallback, and post-spawn verification.
Generate a full agento PR status report — draft readiness, canonical /green, zero-touch rate, inline display, and Slack summary.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | autor-bench-eloop |
| description | Run the autor research and SWE-bench benchmark loop. |
Loop interval: 30m | Max duration: 12h (24 iterations)
Drive the autor research + benchmarking pipeline: run run_autor_experiment.py for technique comparison, evaluate against SWE-bench, and build the bandit state for technique selection.
run_autor_experiment.py exists and passes python3 -m py_compile~/.swes/ai_orch accessible at ~/worktrees/pr6270-swebench/orchestration/tmux list-sessions for autor-* sessions)technique_bandit/bandit_state.json readable# Check active autor runs
tmux list-sessions 2>/dev/null | grep -E "autor-|swebench-" || echo "no active sessions"
# Check latest score files
ls -t research-wiki/scores/SR-*.json 2>/dev/null | head -5
# Check SWE-bench eval status
ls -t ~/.swes/eval_results/ 2>/dev/null | head -3 || echo "no eval results yet"
# Check bandit state
python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('technique_bandit/bandit_state.json')); [print(f'{k}: n={v[\"n\"]}, mean={v[\"mean\"]:.2f}') for k,v in d['techniques'].items()]"
Primary metric: rubric mean across techniques in bandit_state.json.
Secondary metric: SWE-bench resolution rate (instances solved / total evaluated).
# Compute current technique means
python3 -c "
import json
d = json.load(open('technique_bandit/bandit_state.json'))
for k, v in sorted(d['techniques'].items(), key=lambda x: -x[1].get('mean',0)):
print(f'{k}: n={v[\"n\"]}, mean={v[\"mean\"]:.2f}')
"
# Check SWE-bench results if available
if [ -f ~/.swes/eval_results/latest.json ]; then
python3 -c "import json; d=json.load(open('$HOME/.swes/eval_results/latest.json')); print(f'SWE-bench: {d[\"resolved\"]}/{d[\"total\"]} = {d[\"resolved\"]/max(d[\"total\"],1)*100:.1f}%')"
fi
Decision tree:
run_autor_experiment.py --technique <technique> --prs 6265,6261,6245,6269 --n 1swebench-tester subagentai_orch --agent-cli claude vs run_autor_experiment.py comparisonBased on diagnose, pick ONE of:
python scripts/run_autor_experiment.py --technique SR-multi-exemplar --prs 6265,6261,6245,6269 --n 1python scripts/run_autor_experiment.py --technique SR-prtype --prs 6265,6261,6245,6269 --n 1swebench-tester subagentaiorch-cli-tester subagentAppend to wiki/syntheses/et_logs/eloop_cycles.md:
## YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM cycle
### Quality metric: technique means from bandit_state.json
### SWE-bench: X resolved / Y evaluated
### Live vs computed gap: ±X points
### New runs dispatched: [list]
### Findings: [observations]
touch /tmp/autor_bench_eloop_last_run
6a. Run autor experiment:
cd $HOME/llm-wiki-autor-phase3
python scripts/run_autor_experiment.py --technique <chosen> --prs 6265,6261,6245,6269 --n 1 --outdir research-wiki/scores
6b. Run SWE-bench comparison if dispatched:
Use swebench-tester subagent — runs predictions through SWE-bench harness.
6c. Run ai_orch CLI comparison if dispatched: Compare raw CLI output (claude/codex/gemini via ai_orch) vs autor harness on same SWE-bench instances.
## Autor-Bench Loop Cycle — HH:MM
- Best technique: X @ Y.mean (n=Z)
- Live vs computed: ±X pts
- SWE-bench: X% resolution (N/M)
- Next run: technique=Z
| Metric | Source | Healthy threshold |
|---|---|---|
| SR-multi-exemplar mean | bandit_state.json | >86 (Phase 7 live target) |
| Live vs computed gap | run output vs phase7_results.md | <3 pts |
| SWE-bench resolution | ~/.swes/eval_results/latest.json | >15% (beats SWE-agent) |
# Start the loop (via /loop skill)
/loop 30m /autor-bench-eloop
# Or manually for one cycle
/autor-bench-eloop
scripts/run_autor_experiment.py — deterministic autor harnesstechnique_bandit/bandit_state.json — bandit state + technique scoresresearch-wiki/scores/SR-*.json — score artifactswiki/syntheses/phase7_results.md — Phase 7 synthesis~/.swes/ — SWE-bench evaluation suite~/worktrees/pr6270-swebench/orchestration/ — ai_orch CLI orchestration