gogetajob

name

gogetajob

description

Open-source contribution workflow — find GitHub issues, implement fixes, submit PRs, track results. Use when: (1) starting a work loop or contribution cycle (打工, contribute, work on issues), (2) scanning repos for available work, (3) submitting or following up on PRs, (4) syncing PR statuses and handling review feedback, (5) checking work stats or history. Triggers on: 打工, 干活, find work, contribute, open source, scan issues, submit PR, work loop, gogetajob. NOT for: simple one-off code edits, reading code, or tasks unrelated to open-source contribution.

GoGetAJob — Open Source Contribution Workflow

Find GitHub issues, implement fixes, submit PRs, and track everything.

Prerequisites

Required

• FlowForge skill (workflow engine): clawhub install agent-flowforge
• gh CLI (authenticated): gh auth status
• git configured with your identity
• claude CLI (Claude Code): claude --version

Optional

• GoGetAJob CLI for stats/sync: npm install -g @kagura-agent/gogetajob
  • Verify: gogetajob --help
  • Not required for the core work loop — FlowForge handles that

Architecture

• Main session = dispatch + bookkeeping (scan, pick, submit, sync, stats)
• Sub-agents = actual code work (implement, fix CI, address reviews)
• Code changes = always via Claude Code (acpx --approve-all claude exec)

Never do implementation work in the main session. Always delegate to sub-agents.

Quick Commands

Command	What it does
gogetajob scan <owner/repo>	Discover open issues from a repo
gogetajob scan --all	Scan all tracked repos
gogetajob feed	Browse available jobs
gogetajob check <ref>	Deep-inspect an issue before taking it
gogetajob start <ref>	Take a job — fork/clone/branch
gogetajob submit <ref> --tokens N	Push + create PR + record
gogetajob followup <ref> --tokens N	Record additional effort on existing work
gogetajob sync	Check all PR statuses, flag problems
gogetajob watch	Set up automatic sync via cron
gogetajob stats	View overall performance and ROI
gogetajob history	View work log
gogetajob import <repo>	Backfill work_log from GitHub PR history

The Work Loop

The full contribution cycle runs as a FlowForge workflow (workloop). See references/workloop-overview.md for the complete node-by-node breakdown.

Summary:

followup → find_work → study → implement → submit → verify → reflect
    │           │         │                                      │
    │           └─────────┘ (no good issue? loop back)           │
    └────────── (has review feedback? handle it first) ──────────┘

To start: flowforge start workloop

Core Rules

1. Code via Claude Code, not hand-written

Sub-agents delegate all code changes to Claude Code:

cd <repo> && acpx --approve-all claude exec "<task description with full context>"

Task descriptions must include: issue context, reviewer feedback, architecture notes, maintainer preferences from wiki, and a verification suffix:

"Before committing: 1) grep for all test files that import/mock the interfaces you changed, update their mocks. 2) Run the project's test/lint commands. 3) git diff --stat to confirm no files were missed."

Exception: one-line trivial fixes can be done manually.

2. Dogfood everything

After each work session, check: did gogetajob, flowforge, or any tool have bugs or friction? If yes:

• File an issue on the tool's repo
• Or fix it yourself and submit a PR
• Every round should be smoother than the last — this is compounding returns

3. Max 3 open PRs per repo

Before submitting a new PR, check: gh pr list --repo <owner/repo> --author @me --state open

If ≥ 3 open PRs exist, stop. Wait for existing PRs to be reviewed/merged before adding more. Flooding maintainers kills goodwill.

4. Accurate token tracking

Always pass real token counts from sub-agent session_status:

gogetajob submit <ref> --tokens <actual_count>
gogetajob followup <ref> --tokens <actual_count>

Never estimate. Never guess. No number → don't fill it in.

5. Pre-PR checklist (all must pass)

Before creating any PR:

1. Does this PR solve exactly one problem?
2. No existing fix or competing PR upstream?
3. Read CONTRIBUTING.md and recent merge patterns?
4. Can verify the fix locally (tests pass)?
5. Open PRs for this repo ≤ 3?

6. Knowledge accumulation

• Before working on a repo: read wiki/projects/<repo>.md (field notes)
• After finishing: update field notes with lessons, maintainer preferences, CI quirks
• Cross-project insights → memex cards
• Behavioral patterns → beliefs-candidates.md

Sync & Follow-up

Run gogetajob sync regularly (or use gogetajob watch for automatic cron).

When sync flags issues:

Signal	Priority	Action
Human review comment	High	Spawn sub-agent to address, then followup
CI failure	Medium	Spawn sub-agent to fix, then followup
Bot review (CodeRabbit etc.)	Low	Address if substantive, ignore nitpicks
PR closed	—	Read why. If someone else's fix was better, study it

Issue Selection Strategy

When picking issues from gogetajob feed:

• Priority: real bugs > test coverage > docs > features
• Prefer repos with existing field notes (knowledge compounds)
• High-star repos: check for competing PRs first
• Security/infra issues: look for related issues to batch-fix
• Always verify: git log --oneline -20 -- <relevant files> to check if already fixed
• Check maintainer activity: repos that only merge internal PRs are low-ROI for external contributors