skillstead

Author technical/structured SVG infographics and diagrams, then render them to crisp PNG with a headless browser. Best for architecture diagrams, topology maps, flows, before/after comparisons, nested/onion layer models, roadmaps, decision matrices, and social-ready technical one-pagers. Prefers clean line icons in soft tinted circles. First-class Korean/CJK text. Includes an opt-in "tidy hand-drawn" sketch preset (paper background, Korean handwriting font, rough strokes, highlighter). Not for photo-heavy or illustration-heavy graphics, statistical charts, or mascot/character illustration.

Check whether the claims in public-facing documentation (README, release notes, install/usage docs) are supported by the evidence the user provides — files, manifests, logs, and command outputs supplied in the conversation. Produces per-claim findings with a confidence label (verified / unsupported / stale-suspected / needs-human) and an explicit "input scope reviewed" statement. Advisory only. Use when the user asks to fact-check docs, verify a README against a repo, audit release notes, or find stale or overstated documentation claims. Do NOT use for standalone code review or bug hunting, security audits, fix/patch generation, or pure command-execution tasks. When such requests are mixed with an eligible claim-check, still use this skill for the claim-check portion and decline only the out-of-scope part — by contract it does not execute commands or edit files.

Assess and guide safer github.com repository releases. Use when an existing private GitHub repository becomes public for the first time, or whenever an already-public GitHub repository publishes a new version, and the user needs readiness checks, release-surface decisions, explicit mutation approvals, release notes, settings checks, or post-release verification. Supports read-only Assess and approval-gated Guided modes. Do not use for repository bootstrap, package registries, signing, cloud deployment, security audits, GitHub Enterprise, other providers, force-push, or history rewrite.

Compose, assess, revise, and adapt user-facing writing so it reads naturally while preserving meaning, claims, intent, voice, conditions, numbers, identifiers, exceptions, and risks. Use when a user asks to write, review, polish, fix, improve, supplement, clarify, translate, localize, or make a document sound natural; no skill or mode name is required. Covers README, onboarding, release notes, manuals, UI, errors, gallery copy, research-backed briefs, technical comparisons, and natural English↔Korean adaptation. If a host repository workflow owns document classification, path, indexing, lifecycle, or approval, keep it primary and use this skill only as an optional authoring layer. Locale-neutral design; EN↔KO (`ko-KR`) is the initial profile under validation. Do not game detectors, conceal provenance, invent claims, replace evidence review, or bypass host workflows.