feature-development

name	feature-development
description	Use when building new modules or features where teammates can each own a separate piece without stepping on each other

Feature Development: Parallel Module Pattern

Overview

Each teammate owns an independent module or component. They build in parallel without interfering. An integrator ensures cross-module consistency.

Core principle: Conway's Law as a tool — structure the team to mirror the desired architecture.

Management theory: Conway's Law (team structure → system architecture), T-Shaped Skills (specialists who understand the whole), Belbin role coverage.

When to Use

• New feature with 2+ independent components
• Each component can be built and tested in isolation
• Components have well-defined interfaces/contracts
• Code ownership is clear (no two people editing same file)

Don't use when:

• Components are tightly coupled
• Interface contracts are undefined
• Single module that can't be split

Team Composition

coordinator (lead, delegate mode recommended)
├── architect × 1          (designs interfaces, reviews contracts)
├── implementer × 2-3      (one per module)
├── reviewer × 1            (code quality + spec compliance)
└── integrator × 1          (optional: cross-module consistency)

Belbin coverage:

• Thinking: architect (Plant) + reviewer (Monitor-Evaluator)
• Action: implementers (Implementer)
• People: coordinator (Coordinator) + integrator (Teamworker)

Sizing by feature scope:

Feature Size	Team	Notes
2 modules	3-4	coordinator + 2 implementers + reviewer
3-4 modules	4-5	+ architect for interface design
5+ modules	5-7	+ integrator, or split into sub-teams

The Process

Phase 1: Forming — Architecture & Contracts

Before spawning implementers:

1. Coordinator or architect defines module boundaries
2. Define interface contracts between modules (API signatures, data shapes)
3. Create task list with dependencies
4. Each module is a task assigned to one implementer

Critical: Interface contracts MUST be locked before implementation starts (Tuckman's Norming). Changing contracts mid-build invalidates parallel work.

Contract template:

Module A provides:
  - function doX(input: TypeA): TypeB
  - emits event "x-complete" with payload TypeC

Module B consumes:
  - calls A.doX() with [specific inputs]
  - listens for "x-complete"

Agreed data types: [shared types file]

Phase 2: Storming — Plan Review

• Architect presents module split + contracts
• Reviewer checks for gaps, ambiguities
• Devil-advocate (or reviewer) challenges: "What if module A fails? What's the error contract?"
• Iterate until contracts are solid

Phase 3: Performing — Parallel Implementation

Each implementer:

1. Works only on their assigned module
2. Follows the agreed interface contract
3. Writes tests for their module in isolation
4. Commits independently (no file conflicts)

File ownership rule: No two implementers touch the same file. If shared code is needed, the integrator or architect handles it.

Coordinator in delegate mode:

• Does NOT implement anything
• Tracks progress via task list
• Unblocks stuck implementers
• Routes cross-module questions to architect

Phase 4: Integration

Integrator (or coordinator):

1. Verifies all modules implement their contracts
2. Writes integration tests
3. Checks cross-cutting concerns (error handling, logging, auth)
4. Resolves any interface mismatches

Phase 5: Adjourning — Review & Reflect

• Reviewer runs full review on integrated code
• team-orchestrator:session-reflection captures learnings

Conway's Law: Team ↔ Architecture Mapping

Structure your team to produce the architecture you want:

Desired Architecture	Team Structure
Microservices	1 implementer per service
Monolith with modules	1 implementer per module, shared integrator
Frontend + Backend	1 FE impl + 1 BE impl (see cross-layer pattern)
Plugin system	1 impl for core + 1 per plugin

Anti-pattern: Splitting by file instead of by feature. This produces files that "work" in isolation but features that don't cohere.

Common Mistakes

Mistake	Fix
Start implementing before contracts locked	Norming gate: plan must be approved
Two implementers editing same file	Assign file ownership explicitly
No integration phase	Integrator role exists for this
Coordinator starts coding	Enable delegate mode
Contracts too vague	Include data types + error cases
No shared types file	Architect creates it before implementation

Integration

Pre-requisite: team-orchestrator:orchestrating-work routes here Post-requisite: team-orchestrator:session-reflection records learnings Related: superpowers:subagent-driven-development for single-session alternative