원클릭으로
review-tests
Comprehensive test review using parallel test-reviewer agents.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Comprehensive test review using parallel test-reviewer agents.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Create, list, and resolve review issues. Critical issues get individual files for research; warnings and gaps go to a quick-fix checklist.
Analyze Claude Code session transcripts — search, summarize, list, or inspect how a session went.
Design architecture docs for new features, refactors, or redesigns. Produces implementation-ready docs with complete file impact analysis.
Review architecture documents against code implementation and principles.
Orchestrate sequential documentation audits with checkpointing and resumption.
Guide sprint planning from scope assessment to spec artifacts.
| name | review-tests |
| description | Comprehensive test review using parallel test-reviewer agents. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Orchestrate a comprehensive test review using parallel test-reviewer agents.
Find all test files:
Glob: **/test_*.py, **/*_test.py
Map each test file to its source:
tests/test_foo.py → src/.../foo.pysrc/.../tests/test_bar.py → src/.../bar.pyReport: "Found N test files covering M source modules"
Group tests for parallel review. Options:
Default: By module (all tests for a source module → one agent)
For each group, launch test-reviewer agent:
Task(
subagent_type="test-reviewer",
prompt="Review tests.\n\ntest_path: {paths}\nsource_path: {paths}",
run_in_background=true
)
Launch ALL agents in a single message for true parallelism.
Wait for all agents to complete. Gather structured output.
Combine findings across all agents:
# Test Review Summary
## Overall
- Files reviewed: N
- Tests reviewed: N
- Remove: N | Improve: N | Add: N | Keep: N
## By Priority
### High (Remove - tests with no value)
[List across all files]
### Medium (Add - important gaps)
[List across all files]
### Low (Improve - existing tests to refine)
[List across all files]
## By Module
[Findings grouped by source module]
Based on findings, recommend: