원클릭으로
literature-survey
Literature survey and review workflow. Triggers on "survey", "综述", "这个方向有什么", "literature review", "related work".
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Literature survey and review workflow. Triggers on "survey", "综述", "这个方向有什么", "literature review", "related work".
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Citation chain exploration. Triggers on "引用链", "谁引了", "citation", "参考文献", "这篇引了谁".
Morning paper reading workflow. Triggers on "start my day", "今天看什么", "morning digest", "每日推荐".
Deep analysis of a single paper. Triggers on "分析这篇", "deep dive", "这篇论文讲了什么", paper ID or arXiv ID input.
AI research paper intelligence — router skill that detects user intent and delegates to the appropriate workflow. Triggers on paper, arxiv, digest, research, 论文, arXiv IDs, ML method names, or academic research questions.
Batch paper screening and classification. Triggers on "筛一下", "triage", "哪些值得看", "帮我筛", "batch screen".
Research trend analysis and insight generation. Triggers on "趋势", "trend", "这个方向火不火", "research insight", "方向分析".
| name | literature-survey |
| description | Literature survey and review workflow. Triggers on "survey", "综述", "这个方向有什么", "literature review", "related work". |
Context carry-over:
paper_quick_scan(topic, limit=20), then show as table and [FORK] "全部纳入还是选几篇?"Extract structured profiles: Call paper_extract(paper_id) for each selected paper to get structured data (task, method, datasets, baselines, metrics, best_results).
Build comparison table: Call paper_compare_table(paper_ids) for data-driven comparison instead of LLM-only generation.
Generate survey with structured tables:
paper_compare_table datapaper_credibility_batch(paper_ids)paper_field_stats("method_family") and paper_field_stats("datasets") for data-driven insightsAuto-save: call paper_save_report(report_type="survey", content=<survey markdown>, filename="{topic}.md") to persist the survey.
[CONTEXT-AWARE FORK] — Based on the survey result, suggest next steps:
If survey found clear research gaps: "文献综述已保存至 {path}(涵盖 {N} 篇论文)。\n💡 下一步建议:\n1. 基于发现的研究空白生成 research ideas\n2. 导出 {N} 篇论文的 BibTeX — 可以直接用在 related work\n(说编号或告诉我你想做什么)"
If survey shows a dominant method family: "文献综述已保存至 {path}。\n💡 下一步建议:\n1. 深入分析 [{dominant_method}] 方向的代表论文 [{top_paper_title}]\n2. 导出 BibTeX 写 related work\n(说编号或告诉我你想做什么)"
If survey covers many diverse methods: "文献综述已保存至 {path}。\n💡 下一步建议:\n1. 看看 [{topic}] 的趋势分析 — 哪个子方向在上升\n2. 导出 BibTeX\n(说编号或告诉我你想做什么)"
paper_export(paper_ids, format) for BibTeX/markdownpaper_group_add(name="survey-{topic}", paper_ids, create_if_missing=True) to group paperspaper_quick_scan returns 15-20 candidates with one-line summaries. Present this list and let user decide next steps. This IS the survey for most cases.
Only when user explicitly asks for "完整综述" / "full survey" / "详细一点":
paper_quick_scan(topic, limit=40)paper_save_report. Additional export (BibTeX) is opt-in via FORK.