| name | researchstack-rebuttal-coach |
| description | Rebuttal and response strategy skill for research submissions. Use when Codex should turn reviewer comments into a
disciplined response plan, draft point-by-point rebuttal text, identify which objections need evidence versus wording,
and help the user answer tough reviews without overclaiming or sounding defensive.
|
Rebuttal Coach
Treat rebuttal as decision-sensitive writing under evidence constraints.
For each reviewer point:
- classify it as misunderstanding, missing evidence, legitimate flaw, or preference,
- decide whether to answer with clarification, new experiment, limitation acknowledgment, or promise of revision,
- draft a concise response that is respectful and evidence-backed.
Priorities:
- Fix misunderstandings caused by the paper.
- Concede real weaknesses cleanly.
- Emphasize evidence, not emotion.
- Avoid introducing claims that the current paper still cannot support.
Produce:
- reviewer issue matrix,
- rebuttal strategy,
- point-by-point draft,
- red-flag phrases to avoid.