원클릭으로
delegation-advisor
Recommend who should do a task (Claude Code, Gemini, ChatGPT, Human, Taskmaster, MCPs) and generate handoff prompts.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Recommend who should do a task (Claude Code, Gemini, ChatGPT, Human, Taskmaster, MCPs) and generate handoff prompts.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
Writes, edits, and creates dbt models following best practices. Use when user needs to create new dbt SQL models, update existing models, or convert raw SQL to dbt format. Handles staging, intermediate, and mart models with proper config blocks, CTEs, and documentation.
Apply Domain-Driven Design, Clean Architecture, CQRS, and command/query patterns to code reviews and feature design. Use when analyzing or designing code in Application, Service, Infrastructure, DataAccess, Validation, Domain, or Functions projects, or when addressing architectural concerns, layering, mapping, entities, value objects, repositories, or validators in the Rome Repair Order Service.
Analyzes and refactors code using Domain-Driven Design principles. Use when refactoring domain models, identifying DDD anti-patterns, improving domain clarity, or applying tactical/strategic DDD patterns.
Guide for DDD strategic design - analyzing domains through structured questioning, conducting stakeholder interviews (PM/domain experts/users), and producing Bounded Context analysis, Context Maps, and Ubiquitous Language. Use when user needs help understanding domain boundaries, planning domain interviews, or structuring DDD strategic artifacts.
Win competitive rounds: run a clean process, deliver value previews before asking, coordinate partners, and manage timelines. Use when you're trying to close a 'must win' deal against other funds.
End-to-end associate workflow with time-boxed gates: thesis -> sourcing -> meetings -> diligence -> memo, ending with either IC-ready memo or explicit kill decision. Use when you need to run the full pipeline for a sector or a specific deal.
| name | delegation-advisor |
| description | Recommend who should do a task (Claude Code, Gemini, ChatGPT, Human, Taskmaster, MCPs) and generate handoff prompts. |
| triggers | ["who should do this","delegate","assign tasks","what can AI do","מי יכול לעשות את זה"] |
Analyze tasks and recommend optimal delegation - whether to human, AI agent, or external tool. Generate appropriate prompts for AI delegation.
This skill helps determine the best assignee for each task based on the task's requirements and each agent's strengths. It also generates handoff prompts tailored to the selected agent.
Strengths:
Best For: Implementation tasks, technical building, automation
Prompt Style: Detailed specs, clear acceptance criteria, technical requirements
Example Tasks:
Strengths:
Best For: Research tasks, document analysis, literature review
Prompt Style: Clear research questions, source guidance, expected output format
Example Tasks:
Strengths:
Best For: Content creation, ideation, copywriting
Prompt Style: Creative briefs, tone guidance, audience context
Example Tasks:
Strengths:
Best For: Decisions, reviews, external communication, sign-offs
Requires: Clear options and recommendations, decision criteria
Example Tasks:
Strengths:
Best For: Task CRUD operations, status updates, project tracking
Integration: Direct MCP calls
Example Tasks:
| MCP | Best For | Example Use |
|---|---|---|
| Monday | Project boards, team collaboration | Sync tasks to team board |
| Google Drive | Document storage, sharing | Save deliverables, share with stakeholders |
| Gmail | Email communication | Send updates, schedule meetings |
| Calendar | Scheduling | Book meetings, set reminders |
Assess the task across these factors:
| Factor | Questions |
|---|---|
| Technical complexity | Does it require coding? System design? |
| Creative requirements | Does it need writing? Ideation? |
| Decision authority | Does it need human judgment? |
| External communication | Does it involve stakeholders? |
| Time sensitivity | Is there urgency? |
| Context requirements | How much background is needed? |
Apply matching logic:
IF technical_building OR coding:
→ Claude Code (confidence: high)
ELIF deep_research OR multi_doc_analysis:
→ Gemini (confidence: high)
ELIF creative_writing OR brainstorming:
→ ChatGPT (confidence: medium)
ELIF strategic_decision OR stakeholder_communication:
→ Human (Omer) (confidence: high)
ELIF task_tracking OR status_update:
→ Taskmaster MCP (confidence: high)
ELSE:
→ Present options to human (confidence: low)
Output:
assignee: Selected agent nameconfidence: high | medium | lowreasoning: Why this agent is best suitedFor AI agents, generate a structured handoff prompt:
## Task Handoff: {task_name}
### Context
{project_context_summary}
### Objective
{clear_task_description}
### Requirements
- {requirement_1}
- {requirement_2}
### Acceptance Criteria
- {criterion_1}
- {criterion_2}
### Constraints
- {constraint_1}
### Output Format
{expected_deliverable_format}
CHECKPOINT: Present recommendation to user
Ask:
{project}_tasks.mdUser Request:
"מי יכול לעשות את המחקר על frameworks קיימים?"
Analysis:
Recommendation:
Recommended Assignee: Gemini Confidence: High Reasoning: This is a research task requiring analysis of multiple documents and comparison. Gemini excels at deep research and long-context processing.
Generated Prompt for Gemini:
## Task Handoff: Research Existing AI Frameworks
### Context
Working on an AI Strategy project for the Law Faculty. Need to understand the landscape of existing frameworks before proposing our approach.
### Objective
Research and analyze existing AI governance/strategy frameworks used in academic institutions, particularly law schools.
### Requirements
- Find at least 5 relevant frameworks
- Focus on academic/educational contexts
- Include both governance and implementation aspects
### Acceptance Criteria
- Summary of each framework (1-2 paragraphs)
- Comparison table with key features
- Recommendations on which elements to adopt
### Output Format
Markdown document with sections for each framework, comparison table, and recommendations